Showing posts with label inventory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inventory. Show all posts

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Starter home crisis: San Jose is third worst in U.S. for first-time buyers


2012 file photograph: Longtime West Oakland resident Ruby Shaw in her neighborhood, on 13th Street near Wood Street. (Jane Tyska/Staff)As the spring house-hunting season approaches, tight inventory and rising prices are casting a lengthening shadow over the plans of starter homebuyer across the United States. And guess where the crisis is most pronounced?

Oakland.

That's right. According to a new Trulia report on the 100 largest U.S. metro areas, Oakland is as bad as it gets when it comes to buying a starter home. The rest of the top five, in order, are Los Angeles, San Jose, San Francisco and Sacramento.

Compared to the rest of the nation, the Bay Area is "taking the biggest hit," said Ralph McLaughlin, chief economist for Trulia, which released the quarterly price report titled, "House Arrest: How Low Inventory is Slowing Home Buying."

Of the top 10 U.S. metro markets showing the sharpest decrease in starter home affordability since 2012, nine are in California. The report defines a starter home as one that's priced in the bottom third of all homes in the market -- where first-time buyers often look. Similarly, Trulia defines starter homebuyer as those whose household incomes fall in the lower third of the income distribution for a given metro area. In the Oakland metro area, that means an income of $52,700 and under; in San Jose, of $64,900 and under; in San Francisco, $62,000 and under.

Here are three snapshots of what's happening in our own region:


  • In the Oakland area -- where the tech boom has spread, driving up prices -- the typical buyer of a starter home would have to spend 69 percent of household income to afford a 30-year fixed mortgage, with 20 percent down. That's 29 percent more of the income than would have been needed in 2012. The median price of a starter home in the Oakland area is $374,000, according to the report.



  • As bad as that sounds, consider the plight of San Jose starter homebuyer, who would have to spend 87 percent of household income to afford a mortgage -- 27 percent more than in 2012. The median price in the San Jose metro area is about $586,000.



  • Finally, San Francisco metro buyers would have to pay a whopping 110 percent of household income to afford a starter home mortgage -- 25 percent more than in 2012. The median San Francisco metro price is $714,000.


"I'm proud to be from the Bay Area and to see how much economic activity is here and how much technological advancement," said McLaughlin, who grew up in San Jose's Berryessa district and moved two years ago from San Francisco to Oakland. "At the same time, I'm ashamed by how those in the middle and lower income brackets are essentially becoming locked out of the housing market."

Given the demand in pricey markets like the Bay Area, a new phenomenon is growing: When it comes time to move, middle-tier homeowners "increasingly find themselves looking down the housing ladder" toward houses priced in the lower third of the market, McLaughlin said.

Here's an example: Say a worker who owns a comfortable place in more affordable Contra Costa County suddenly must move close to a new job in San Jose. He or she may wind up downsizing because of the increased cost of housing.

"Or someone who is moving into the Bay Area from another market -- even from Sacramento," McLaughlin said. "Normally they might want to buy a four-bed, three-bath house for the family. But they get there and they can't afford it."

Again, they downsize, sometimes dramatically.

As those middle-tier buyers move down the housing ladder, it exerts pressure on prices in the bottom third of the market, intensifying the competition for first-time buyers.

Trulia reports that of the 100 largest metro areas in the U.S., 95 have shown a decrease in the number of starter homes since 2012. Of the 10 metro areas showing the biggest decline, all are in the West and South. Salt Lake City tops the list: In four years, the number of starter homes there has plummeted from 1,243 to 151. That's an 88 percent drop-off.

The report cites three reasons for falling inventory in the starter home and mid-tier "trade-up" categories:


  • Investors snapped up foreclosed homes during the recession and converted them to rentals.



  • A larger share of lower-priced homes remains underwater compared to higher-tier homes. Their owners therefore are less likely to sell and take a loss.



  • Rising prices have created a general housing gridlock, as the price spread between trade-up and premium homes keeps widening.


It all adds up to bad news for starter-home buyers. Those "making their first foray into homeownership," the report said, "are worse off than they've been in years."

Souce: San Jose Mercury News, Richard Scheinin
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_29670665/starter-home-crisis-san-jose-first-time-buyers

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

6 Ways to Explain Low Inventory

Where Have All the Sellers Gone?

Everywhere you turn, there's a new story about how the lack of homes on the market is driving up prices and driving buyers crazy. But what's the reason behind this trend?

There are a number of factors, according to a recent article at Real Estate Economy Watch. Make sure you understand the logic behind the market, so you can be the best advocate for your clients during these somewhat stressful times.

1.) Many home owners are still underwater. One of five homeowners with a mortgage still doesn’t have enough equity to sell. This isn't the same situation as we saw during the depths of the housing crisis, but it's still making its mark on inventory levels. Although rising prices may slowly reduce the number of home owners who owe more than their property is worth, Real Estate Economy Watch predicts that significant numbers will continue to be equity-challenged for several years to come, especially in Arizona, California, Florida, and Nevada.

2.) Boom buyers are still holding out. About 16 million families bought homes in the peak of the boom around a decade ago, and many are still waiting around to make a profit, even if they aren't underwater. Even if CoreLogic's prediction that the national median price will reach the peak of 2007 in the next year or so does come to fruition, Real Estate Economy Watch says many of these peak buyers will have to wait another five years or more before they realize much profit on their homes.

3.) The inventory shortage is squeezing move-ups. Owners who may be ready to move into a larger or more expensive home are often considered hidden drivers of the market. But right now, price instability and the lack of available homes is causing this group to hold off. But Real Estate Economy Watch says that stability is coming, despite the inflationary impact of market shortages, and predicts that this "vicious cycle" will ease.

4.) Investors aren't ready to sell single-family homes they're renting. They're making money from both rising rents and home price appreciation. And that's why Real Estate Economy Watch cautions against assuming they'll "sell their mini gold mines to homeowners anytime soon." The upside? At least some young prospective owners have access to a relatively affordable alternative to apartments, where they can start families while they wait for entry-level homes to come on the market.

5.) New-home construction is still very low. It may be tempting to blame this on the builders, but Real Estate Economy Watch points out that after the crash in 2007, thousands of smaller builders closed down, and many of those who survived did so by selling off their inventories of prime real estate earmarked for future construction. They predict that builders will make a dent in the higher-tier housing soon, but that they would help the inventory problem more if they concentrated on the lower-end demand.

6.) Baby boomers are running behind. Everything from later retirement ages, longer careers, better health, and loss of household wealth/equity during the Great Recession have contributed to a slower-than-expected timeline for this generation. But Real Estate Economy Watch predicts that this will change as many must convert their equity into cash while they can still enjoy it, and says others won't be able to afford the costs to retrofit current homes in order to age in place.

Source: Realtor Mag Onlin - Real Estate Economy Watch, Where Have All The Sellers Gone?
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2016/03/23/6-ways-explain-low-inventory?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BW8tT2B9MB5MZl&om_ntype=RMODaily
http://www.realestateeconomywatch.com/2016/03/where-have-all-the-sellers-gone/

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Cities Plagued by Shrinking Inventory - and guess which one is #1. . . .

Low inventory means higher home prices and buyers competing with each other with multiple offers. It's a reality going on here for awhile in the silicon valley, which is why many agents prefer working with sellers and getting a listing (home for sale) rather than work with buyers. It's not that those agents refuse to work with a buyer because they will, it's just that when you're working with a buyer, it's harder in this market to get them into a home, which means no commission if they don't succeed. 

If you are a buyer looking to get into a home in this market, you must be very serious, pre-approved for a home loan and willing to listen to the advice of your Realtor if you want to stand a chance of getting into the home. Be prepared to compete with other buyers, some of whom will be making All Cash offers. Also be prepared to make an offer possibly well over the asking price (depending on the neighborhood, school districts and some other factors your Realtor will discuss with you). 

The article cites San Jose California as the #1 city with the lowest inventory. San Jose is the heart of the Silicon Valley, and the story is the pretty much the same for the surrounding cities here in the valley. The tech giants here in the valley, such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Intel, keep bringing in more and more workers thus putting strain on housing market. Evidence for this can be seen with low inventory and developers coming in and building mega apartment blocks and charging sky high rents.


Cities Plagued by Shrinking Inventory


More than 1.3 million – or 1.6 percent of the nation’s nearly 85 million residential properties – are vacant. That’s down 9.3 percent from the third quarter of 2015, according to RealtyTrac’s first quarter 2015 Residential Property Vacancy Analysis.

“With several notable exceptions, the challenge facing most U.S. real estate markets is not too many vacant homes but too few,” says Daren Blomquist, vice president at RealtyTrac. “The razor-thin vacancy rates in many markets are placing upward pressure on home prices and rents. While that may be good news for sellers and landlords, it is bad news for buyers and renters and could be bad news for all if prices and rents are inflated above tolerable affordability thresholds.”

RealtyTrac analyzed 147 metro areas with at least 100,000 residential properties and found that the following cities had the fewest number of vacant properties in the first quarter:


  1. San Jose, California: 0.2%
  2. Fort Collins, Colo: 0.2%
  3. Manchester, N.H.: 0.3%
  4. Provo, Utah: 0.3%
  5. Lancaster, Pa.: 0.3%
  6. San Francisco: 0.3%
  7. Los Angeles: 0.4%
  8. Boston: 0.5%
  9. Denver: 0.5%
  10. Washington, D.C.: 0.5%


Meanwhile, vacancies were highest in the first quarter in these cities:
  1. Flint, Mich.: 7.5%
  2. Detroit: 5.3%
  3. Youngstown, Ohio: 4.4%
  4. Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas: 3.8%
  5. Atlantic City, N.J.: 3.7%
  6. Indianapolis: 3%
  7. Tampa, Fla.: 2.9%
  8. Miami: 2.8%
  9. Cleveland: 2.8%
  10. St. Louis, Mo.: 2.6%


Source: Realtor Magazine Online from RealtyTrac
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2016/02/16/cities-plagued-shrinking-inventory?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BWw4bMB9Ku34LR&om_ntype=RMODaily