Saturday, June 20, 2015

Calif. Ordered to Repay $331M Housing Fund

A court has ruled that the state of California must return the $331 million earmarked to help troubled home owners that lawmakers used instead to help repair the state's budget.

Read more: California Sued for Diverting Housing Funds
State court judge Timothy M. Frawley ruled that state lawmakers improperly appropriated a portion of the money California received in 2012 as part of a $25 billion nationwide settlement with the nation's largest banks over mortgage servicing improprieties. The lawsuit had been filed by three nonprofit groups who offer counseling to home owners, who first charged that the state had misappropriated funds away from helping home owners avoid foreclosure through counseling and other educational services. Instead, they charged, the state allocated the funds for other purposes from 2012 to 2014, such as retiring debt issued by low-income housing authorities. 

California's share of the nationwide settlement was $350 million. Judge Frawley ruled that the government had misused $331 million of that settlement for other purposes than what was intended. He ordered the state to return the amount to the special home owner fund "as soon as there is sufficient appropriation 'reasonably' and 'generally' available for such purpose."

Similar lawsuits against states misappropriating funds from the national mortgage settlement also are likely, says Robert Gnaizda, general counsel to the National Asian American Coalition – one of the three groups that served as a plaintiff on the lawsuit, along with the COR Community Development Corp. and the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference.

"We've identified about a dozen states where it might be appropriate to take action," Gnaizda told The New York Times. "We decided not to go forward with other actions until this case was decided."

Source: RealtorMag Online

Friday, June 19, 2015

Foreign Buyers Spend More on U.S. Real Estate

Fewer foreign buyers, but foreign buyers that remain are spending more on U.S. real estate.



Fewer international buyers are flocking to the U.S. to purchase real estate, but those who are, tend to spend more on their home purchases. The total sales dollar volume from international home buyers climbed 13 percent this year compared to last year – at a time when the total unit sales from international home buyers decreased, according to the National Association of REALTORS®' 2015 Profile of Home Buying Activity of International Clients.

From April 2014 through March 2015, total international sales were estimated at $104 billion, trumping last year's $92.2 billion. This represents 8 percent of the total existing-home sales dollar volume, according to NAR's report.

"In 2014, sales transaction to buyers outside of the U.S. dropped 10 percent, possibly due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in relation to international currencies and weakening foreign economies," says NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. "However, the amount of money spent has increased; this means international purchasers in the U.S. have become an upscale group of buyers, spending more money on fewer homes."

Last year, five countries alone accounted for 51 percent of all purchases by international buyers: China, Canada, Mexico, India, and the United Kingdom.

Buyers from China exceeded all other countries in terms of their appetite for U.S. real estate, purchasing an estimated $28.6 billion worth of U.S. property, according to NAR's report. Canada buyers followed with $11.2 billion in purchases and then India at $7.9 billion; Mexico with $4.9 billion; and the United Kingdom at $3.8 billion.

International buyers tended to spend more on their home purchases than the average U.S. home buyer. International buyers spent, on average, $499,600 on their home purchases compared to the overall U.S. average home price of $255,600. Chinese buyers were found to most often spend the most, with an average price of $831,800 on their U.S. home purchases.

More REALTORS® are reporting working with international clients, up from 28 percent in 2013 to 35 percent in 2014. Four states accounted for half of all international sales: Florida, California, Texas, and Arizona, according to NAR's report.

Source: RealtorMag Online

Property values go up, as do assessments

With a hot seller's market such that we're seeing here in the Silicon Valley, comes great property values, and with greater property values comes greater property taxes. It's kind of a downside to owning a home, but the money is need to pay for local services and what-not. For first time home buyers that express angst about buying a home due to property tax, I always remind them that their property can be written off against their personal income taxes.


Property values have been skyrocketing throughout the region, and it's not a surprise that the assessor is close behind.

Of the county's 415,000 owners of single family homes and condominiums, 36,000 can expect a bump, and the majority of those will see a double-digit increase. The tax hikes reflect the latest gains in the market value of homes that sank below their purchase price during the Great Recession, resulting in temporarily lower taxes.

Wednesday's announcement "confirms the continued strength of Silicon Valley's economy," Stone said. "For the first time in years, every city in Santa Clara County experienced a year-over-year increase in market values."

He called the new round of assessments "good news for property owners, because the market is restoring equity they had lost. For every $1 of additional property tax they pay, they receive an additional $100 of equity that was lost during the recession. The way I put it is, 'You give me a dollar, I'll give you a hundred.' "

Notice of the increases in assessed value will be mailed to homeowners June 26.

This is the fourth consecutive year that the number of residential properties assessed below their purchase price has declined.

Three years ago, 134,000 of the county's properties were worth less than what their owners paid for them. Two years ago, that number fell to 79,000, and last year to 36,000. This year, 21,000 remain below their original purchase price. But 13,500 have completely recovered their lost value.

Even the 379,000 homeowners who already stand at market value can expect a 1.99 percent increase in assessed valuation. It's a keeping-up-with-inflation bump that's allowed under the provisions of state Proposition 13, which was passed in 1978.

Under the companion Proposition 8, passed that same year, property that falls below the purchase price is reassessed at the current fair market value. This week's announcement by Stone is a response to the continuing rise in median sale prices, though specific valuations also take other factors into consideration, including geographic location, the number of bedrooms in a home and the quality of neighborhood schools.

Taken countywide, the median sale price rose 15.6 percent over the previous year. Looked at by municipality, the median increase varies:

by 20 percent in the cities of Santa Clara and Cupertino; 10 percent in Los Gatos and Almaden; and 3 percent in Gilroy.

The report issued Wednesday by the assessor also shows that the market value of properties in Los Altos, Mountain View, Cupertino and Palo Alto have risen by more than 40 percent since the recession began in 2008.

The recovery hasn't been so robust in other parts of the county: one third of Gilroy's properties are still assessed below their purchase price, and the same is true for 19 percent of properties in San Jose.

"The properties that got hit the hardest during the recession were in South County: Gilroy, Morgan Hill, San Jose and to a certain extent Milpitas," Stone pointed out. In some parts of South County "the market value declined as much as 60 percent during the recession. That's a pretty big hole."

But the county's homeowners continue to dig their way out.

David Ginsborg, spokesman for the assessor's office, said the June 26 notice will give each homeowner his or her new assessed value and a PIN number to look up the property on the assessor's website. "People want to know, 'What do I do?' Wait until you get the notice on or after June 26, then you can do everything online."


Source: MercuryNews, Richard Scheinin
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_28332338/property-values-go-up-do-assessments

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Report: 90% of Properties Now Have Equity

A new report by CoreLogic shows that more and more homeowners now have plenty of equity in their home. What does this mean? In a nutshell it means that housing market is doing well and the economy overall is past the housing bubble collapse/mess from 2008. 

Allot of homeowners here in the Silicon Valley are sitting on allot of equity, but many don't want to sell (for whatever reason) and because they don't want to sell, it creates an inventory shortage, which leads to home prices going higher, which leads to more equity. Of course none of that would be possible without the robust job market that we are experiencing here in the Silicon Valley/Santa Clara county area with the likes of Google, Apple and Facebook always looking to hire new tech talent.



As home prices rise, more home owners are regaining equity. During the first quarter of this year, about 254,000 properties regained equity, according to CoreLogic’s latest equity report. That now brings the total number of residential properties with a mortgage that have equity to about 44.9 million – or 90 percent – by the end of the first quarter.

“About 90 percent of home owners now have housing equity and, as a result, have experienced an increase in wealth, which can spur additional consumption and investment expenditures,” says Frank Nothaft, chief economist for CoreLogic. “The remaining 10 percent of owners with negative equity will find their home value rising while they continue to pay down principal on their amortizing mortgage loan.”

The still elevated number of home owners who have negative equity remains a concern, however. The number of negative equity households stood at 5.1 million, or 10.2 percent of all properties with a mortgage in the first quarter of this year, according to CoreLogic’s report. That represents a slight drop from 5.4 million homes, or 10.8 percent, that had negative equity in the fourth quarter of 2014.

“Many home owners are emerging from the negative equity trap, which bodes well for a continued recovery in the housing market,” says Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic. “With the economy improving and home owners building equity, albeit slowly, the potential exists for an increase in housing stock available for sale, which would ease the current imbalance in supply and demand. There are still about 5 million home owners who are underwater and we estimate that a further 5 percent appreciation in home values across the U.S. would reduce the number of owners with negative equity by about one million.”

The following states had the highest percentage of properties in the positive equity territory by the end of the first quarter:


  • Texas: 97.7%
  • Hawaii: 96.9%
  • Alaska: 96.8%
  • Montana: 96.8%
  • North Dakota: 96.2%

In general, the majority of positive equity properties are centered at the high end of the housing market, according to the report. For example, 94 percent of homes valued at greater than $200,000 have equity, compared with 85 percent of homes valued at less than $200,000.


Source: RealtorMag Online
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2015/06/17/report-90-properties-now-have-equity?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BVgbyqB9CyjZbQ&om_ntype=RMODaily

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Renters Face Steep Costs in Job Havens

San Jose, right at the heart of Silicon Valley has the most unaffordable rental market in the nation according  to a report by Madvalorem. Just another reason to buy a home rather than continue to get robbed by a greedy landlord. 
Income vs Rent in Top Job Markets - 2015

Some of the fastest growing job markets are also becoming some of the least affordable with rental costs, according to a new report by Madvalorem, a real estate database for property searches. High demand is leading rental costs to soar.

Madvalorem, in analyzing Census and other data, provides the following snapshot of rental costs among the top hiring job markets:

1. San Jose, Calif.
Median rent: $2,570
Income to rent: 37.69%

2. San Francisco, Calif.
Median rent: $3,715
Income to rent: 58.97%

3. Raleigh-Durham, N.C.
Median rent: $1,051
Income to rent: 23.16%

4. Washington, D.C.
Median rent: $2,254
Income to rent: 41.09%

5. Seattle, Wash.
Median rent: $1,791
Income to rent: 32.92%

6. Boston, Mass.
Median rent: $2,900
Income to rent: 64.92%

7. Austin, Texas
Median rent: $1,463
Income to rent: 32.54%

8. Baltimore, Md.
Median rent: $1,600
Income to rent: 46.39%

9. Denver, Colo.
Median rent: $1,595
Income to rent: 38.04%

10. Salt Lake City, Utah
Median rent: $999
Income to rent: 26.14%


Source: RealtorMag Online
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2015/06/15/renters-face-steep-costs-in-job-havens?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BVfxYmB9CqZN0o&om_ntype=RMODaily