Sunday, May 31, 2015

10 THINGS TO ASK YOUR REALTOR BEFORE YOU LIST YOUR HOME WITH THEM

Any agent worth their salt should be able to answer all these questions honestly. I know I am prepared to answer them.

When looking for a great real estate agent, there are many things that you'll have to consider. Your ideal agent will be knowledgeable about your local market, experienced, and have a plethora of connections to navigate you through the home sale process. Here are some important questions that you should ask your real estate agent before you list your home with them:

1. In which neighborhoods do you primarily work?

This is important because you'll want a realtor that is experienced in the specific market in which your home is located.  The more knowledgeable your agent is about the neighborhood you're selling in, the better, because they will be able to price your house according to the comps and first hand information that they glean from being familiar with the area.

2. What percentage of your clients are buyers versus sellers?

You want to make sure your agent has buyers for your home at the ready, but you also want to make sure they know how to list a home for sale to get you the best price.

3. Will I be working with just you, or any other associates?

This is important so that you know what to expect when it comes to working with your agent. If your agent has an assistant or anyone working under them that you can contact when they are not available, you should find out as soon as possible.

4. Do you work full-time or part-time?

Some agents work full time and some work part time, so you'll want to find out what to expect. Obviously, if your agent is working part time because it's their side job, they may be more difficult to contact at certain times. If this is the case, you'll want to figure out a set time that you can call them during the week.

5. How many homes have you closed in my neighborhood?

If your agent has closed a good number of homes in your neighborhood, you can assume that they have the experience to get the job done. Having this track record is a good sign that your agent knows the neighborhood well and has the right contacts.

6. How many other sellers are you representing?

When you ask your agent this you might want to note that the busiest agents are usually the most efficient. If your agent has a lot on their plate they know how to multitask, have processes in place and always manage to get things done.

7. Is your license in good standing?

You can check your agent's certification yourself with your state's Department of Real Estate, as many states provide this information online. This can give you peace of mind if you are nervous about hiring an agent and getting started.

8. How many years of education and experience do you have?

Typically, experience and a record of continued education is a sign of a seasoned agent that you can count on. Of course you can also find a great agent that does not have extensive education, but it certainly helps to know in your initial search.

9. Are you also a broker?

Agents that are also brokers have taken additional education classes and have earned a broker's license. A broker may have more experience and may hold responsibility over other agents that are working under them.

10. Can you provide me with the names and phone numbers of past clients who have agreed to be references?

By doing this, you can gain valuable insight from past clients so you can learn more about your agent. This can create a greater level of comfort when working with your agent after hearing the advice and comments from real people that they worked with.

When it comes to asking your agent questions, don't be shy! There are tons of questions that you can ask that will aid you in your decision to choose who represents you. If you're a first time seller, take advantage of these questions to help find the best agent that fits your needs. Don't worry, there's an agent out there for you! Good Luck!


Souce: RealtyTimes, Written by www.exposeyourselfpr.com
http://realtytimes.com/consumeradvice/sellersadvice1/item/35298-20150529-10-things-to-ask-your-realtor-before-you-list-your-home-with-them

Saturday, May 30, 2015

Why having a dual agent to represent you is not a good idea

Hello to everyone reading my blog. I hope you all are having a great day.

Below is a conversation I wrote down shortly after it took place (as best as I can remember it) because it is a good example of how working with an agent who is representing both you as the home buyer and also the seller (called dual agent/agency) is usually not a good idea. Here in the Silicon Valley I've seen many transactions go down this way, many of those with some, so called reputable, top producer real estate agents.

Below is my take on the situation. You're not gonna hear anyone else in the industry explain it to you as honestly and simply like me.

So why is dual agency not a good idea you ask? Because think about it; if you're selling your home, your agent has an obligation to you to sell your home for the most money possible, BUT if that same agent is represent both you and buyer there is a conflict of interest. The conflict comes from the fact that an agent representing the buyer also has an obligation to the buyer to sell the home for as little money as possible! 

So what's an agent to do? Well, you got to remember that real estate agents get paid on commission which is a percentage of the sales price. So the more money the home sells for, the more money we make.

As the home buyers, how can you get hurt? Well, because the agents gets paid on commission and that means that a higher sales price means more money for her/him. That agent who you think is looking out for your best interest may not be telling you the whole story. He might tell you to make a counter offer for more money because there are supposedly competing offers when there are not, and he's not gonna tell you the seller is OK with taking a lessor price. Remember, a higher sales price means more money - your bargain on the property be dammed.

As a seller, how can you get burned? As you will see from my conversation below with my client, one way a home seller can get burned from having their agent represent them and the buyer is when you have multiple offers an all of those buyers have their own agent excepts for one buyer who is willing to work with your agent directly to buy your property. These other offers might be a little higher, or those buyers might be willing to counter offer for more money, but your agent is only going to care about having you accept the offer from the buyer who she represents - because she will make TWO COMMISSIONS! Think about it. . . 

Anyhow, below is my conversation take took place with my client (whose name was changed to protect her identity) and you can read for yourself how she got burned by her agent who was only looking out for wallet first and not client.


My client, Sandy, found me from the flier that I gave her husband at my open house on the weekend of May 22 &23.

Mimi: Are you working with any agents right now?  If you are, I cannot help you.

Sandy: I am, but I don’t want him to help us to buy the house.

Mimi: Why?

Sandy: He is our listing agent for my condo right now. We will close the transaction soon. I don’t like him.  He told me when we met that my condo looks better than the other condo that he sold for $425K, and I can get more money.  My husband and I trusted him and listed the property with him.  After the open house, he said we only got two offers.  One of the offers is one in which he represents the buyer and the other is from another agent for little lower.  He wanted us to sign the offer. I asked him why he didn’t ask for more money. He said his buyer offer is higher than other offer, and we should take it.  I said to him that you told me my condo is better than other and that we should get more money.  He said $425K is good offer. I don’t trust him because he is representing us as the sellers and the buyer. He should work his best for me to get more money, but he didn’t. 

Mimi: Did you tell him?

Sandy: I did, but he said it is the best offer and wanted us to sign. I am not happy, but we signed.

Mimi: Oh! Why you didn’t use him to help you to purchase the house on 805 N. Main Street?

Sandy: We asked him to show us the property. My husband went to your open house, but we wanted to view one more time.  He said he wanted to schedule with other property (younger street) so we can view two together. It was on Monday and Tuesday. He didn’t help. I asked my husband to call you, but he is kind of reluctance and didn’t want to, so I called you.

Mimi: Did you sign any buyer agreement or any documents?  If you did, I would get in trouble.

Sandy: NO. I didn’t sign any documents and don’t want him to represent us anymore. All he thinks of is his commission check and how to make more money for himself, regardless if it doesn’t help us.

Mimi: I can only help you and your husband if you want to work with me and didn’t sign any agreement with your agent.

Sandy: NO. We didn’t sign any papers. We don’t want to use him. He only thought about what  benefits him in order to make more money from my condo even though it was not in our best interest.  If he had done the counter offer like we asked, we would have got $5 or $10 thousands more.  I am not happy with his service. I really don’t trust him with helping us.

Mimi: OK. I closed one transaction with him 5 years ago. I know him.  Well, I will try my best to help you. This property already went in contract on Thursday morning.  We can only submit a purchase offer as a backup offer.

Sandy: OK, we’ll go to meet my husband to sign the offer.


Mimi: Thank you so much.



Related:

ALERT: Wire Fraudsters Targeting Real Estate Transactions

I thought I heard of everything until I saw this article. I guess thieves are more inventive than I thought.

Now it seems, scammers will hack a Realtor's email account and monitor her/his email to see when a particular transaction is closing, the buyer's email address, etc. Once they know that they will send an email to the buyer with bank wire instructions. And of course that wire is to the bank account of the criminal, and the next thing you know the buyer's account will be drained.

So there it is in a nutshell. Another scam to keep an eye out for.



ALERT: Wire Fraudsters Targeting Real Estate Transactions

Friday, May 29, 2015

The Homeowner’s Guide to Land Use Laws

The Homeowner’s Guide to Land Use Laws
Thinking of setting up a backyard chicken coop or building a guesthouse? Make sure local laws allow it, or you could be looking at a hefty fine.
shutterstock_190576670
Land use law is a huge library of legal doctrine dating back centuries, covering everything from water and mineral rights to real estate planning and zoning. But how do these laws impact the average urban, suburban or rural homeowner, and what sort of liability could someone face if they accidentally or purposefully violated local land use laws?

What exactly is land use law?

The term refers to the body of real estate law that regulates the development and conservation of privately owned land. Government properties are not subject to land use restrictions.

Land use laws are controversial because the U.S. Constitution guarantees our liberty, which has always been interpreted to include the free use and control of one’s land. However, land use regulations have become increasingly necessary to curtail the environmental impact of growing populations, and to maintain order in certain urban and suburban areas.

What is an example of a land use law?

While many land use regulations are complex, interwoven labyrinths of local, state and federal laws, planning and zoning legislation is one type of land use law familiar to most people. These laws ensure that businesses are built in one area, residences in another — and that gentlemen’s clubs stay on the outskirts of town.

Are land use laws different from deed restrictions?

Land use laws are imposed by the government, whereas deed restrictions are defined by community associations. However, the two sets of laws can, and should, overlap on common issues, with deed restrictions possibly imposing greater regulations than the local government.

A violation of local land use laws could result in criminal fines or penalties, while a deed restriction violation is a purely civil matter.

What should urban residents know about farming and land use regulation?

Urban farming has become a hot topic within the realm of land use law, and local zoning laws are of significant importance when planning an urban farm. Depending on the location and size, an urban farm may be as small as a patio garden or as large as a city block, and it may encompass both produce and animal production.

The first type of zoning ordinance an urban farmer should consider pertains to the commercial aspect of urban farming. In other words, can the urban farmer sell crops, meat or eggs for money and, if so, where?

Secondly, farmers must be aware of zoning regulations related to raising animals, primarily those rules concerning neighborhood safety, noise ordinances and cleanliness standards.

Every local jurisdiction maintains its own unique set of zoning laws and conditional exceptions to those laws. For urban farmers interested in starting a community project, the first step is to meet with the local zoning and planning board to present your ideas and determine whether urban farming is feasible in your neighborhood.

Am I allowed to add a mother-in-law suite to my home?

A mother-in-law suite, or an accessory dwelling unit, will likely require a permit from the local municipality prior to construction. In many jurisdictions, this suite is actually considered a separate dwelling unit and, as such, requires issuing notice to the community prior to assembly. While some jurisdictions require a simple explanation of the proposed building, others need to see official building plans prior to approval.

Failure to obtain the proper permit to add an accessory dwelling unit can result in major fines — up to $500 per day or more — for each day the building remains unapproved.

What does the term ‘attractive nuisance’ mean?

An attractive nuisance is any sort of structure, manmade or natural, on your property that may entice children to trespass and play, putting them at risk of injury.

To avoid injuries, many localities have enacted attractive nuisance ordinances to prevent landowners from leaving swimming pools, ponds, trampolines or other known attractions open for danger.

Nuisance abatement ordinances generally impose common-sense regulations on homeowners, including mandatory fencing around pools, safety measures around wells or excavations, and rules against abandoned or vacant buildings.

What are the penalties for ignoring land use laws?

For violators of land use laws, local governments can impose daily fines ranging from a few dollars to several hundred dollars. If the violation presents a major safety issue for neighboring residents, the city may also seek an injunction, or legal order, against the property owner.

If fines and penalties add up past a certain point, the city may initiate a civil lawsuit against the homeowner, which could result in the loss of the property by government reclamation — a drastic, but realistic outcome in certain circumstances.

Source: Zillow Blog, Stephanie Reid, Avvo attorney and NakedLaw contributor
http://www.zillow.com/blog/all-about-land-use-laws-176374/

Thursday, May 28, 2015

What Millennials Want in a Home



Millennials make up the largest share of home buyers at 32 percent, according to a recent generational trends report by the National Association of REALTORS®. While older generations sought out homes with luxury amenities and rooms with one specific purpose, younger buyers are seeking affordable, efficient homes that can be customized to suit their changing needs.

"When it comes to homes today, millennials want something creative, something different," says James Roche, CEO of Houseplans.com. "They want something that better suits the times. For example, fine china and living rooms that nobody ever sets foot in are considered desires of the past. Dining rooms are being converted into home offices. Family rooms are being transformed into media centers. And, homeowners are now leveraging smartphones and tablets to adjust the temperature, or turn on outdoor lights and security systems."

These are the top five millennial home desires, according to Boyce Thompson, former editor of Builder Magazine:

1. Affordability. Many millennials want a home that is affordable, yet "move-in ready," with all the bells and whistles, including an updated kitchen, high-tech amenities, and open, versatile spaces with an indoor-outdoor flow.
2. Efficiency. Millennials tend to be conscious of not being wasteful, and will do what it takes to save on the use of electricity and water. "One [Florida] home I worked on featured one of the earliest disappearing window walls in production housing," says Thompson. "You walked through a short entry vestibule to the main living area, and you looked right through the home, to the pool deck, and out into the Orlando night. The architect, Mike Woodley, and I sat on a couch in the family room and watched the delighted expression of visitors as they entered the space and discovered that a corner of the roof was suspended on a post in the pool."
3. Flexibility. Since millennials see their homes as an extension of the rest of their lives, not just as a refuge from work, they prefer casual, flexible spaces. They want home offices that can convert to a game room and large attic spaces that could eventually be transformed as a play space. Customization of the home is important, even if it means spending extra money. "An ideal floor plan might include an "away" room, especially if you needed to 'get away'  to do yoga, practice the guitar, or, even if you want to isolate your child’s latest Lego creation," says Thompson. "Then, later on, this space could eventually be converted into a bedroom."
4. Going Green. A recent study from NAR revealed that 10% of millennials seek out new-home construction for green/energy efficient reasons. As a group, young buyers prefer green building and homes that use sustainable, recycled materials. They want housing that's smaller and energy-efficient (think LED lighting), and they appreciate good engineering.
5. Entertaining. It should be no surprise that the younger generation wants a home that they can show off to their neighbors and friends and use as an entertainment space – from fire pits to open floor plans to game rooms. They also have a deep appreciation for versatile outdoor spaces that extend living space.


Source: Houseplans.com, via RealtorMag Online
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2015/05/21/what-millennials-want-in-home?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BVXhmfB9B$waa6&om_ntype=RMODaily

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Analyst: Housing bubble not a question of if but when

It's got to go down at some point folks. While I am extremly happy for the sellers out there who are selling their home way over asking, I also feel bad for some of the home buyers out there that are getting priced out of the market. I know this bubble we're in here in the Silicon Valley is fueled by both tech sector growth and cash buyer investors, it can't last forever. Every real estate market hits a peak at some point before the decline. Of course WHEN this market will hit its peak is debatable. Anyhow, it won't be a happy time for homeowners, but it will bring many new and eager buyers into the market who were waiting on the sidelines. Remember, it cyclical folks.

Housing bubble
Charles Hughes Smith at oftwominds.com warns that the industry may be just two years from an implosion of the bubble we’re in. Also, if you didn’t know, he argues we’re already in an echo bubble from the last bubble.

The last housing bubble took about 3 years from peak to trough, and this provides a baseline projection for the decline of the current housing bubble, which is shaping up as a classic echo-bubble: very much like the previous bubble, but of slightly lower magnitude.

The projected decline over the next three years to the 110 level is the best-case scenario. Analyst Mark Hanson made a very persuasive case for a much sharper drop when the current housing bubble pops: Mark Hanson Is In "Full-Blown, Black-Swan Lookout Mode" For Housing Bubble 2.0.

In essence, Hanson suggests that the narrow base of the current bubble expansion--all cash buyers (speculators, private-equity funds, overseas oligarchs and corrupt officials, etc.) and marginal borrowers relying on highly leveraged FHA and VA mortgages--will collapse much quicker than the previous bubble, which was inflated by a much larger base of market participants.

Bubbles also have a habit of overshooting when they finally burst. the Federal Reserve acted quickly to re-inflate the housing bubble by lowering interest rates to near-zero and buying over $1 trillion of mortgage-backed securities. Given the narrow base of the current bubble, these tricks will not work should the Fed attempt to inflate Housing Bubble 3.0

In general, bubbles are followed by echo-bubbles, and the bursting of the second bubble ends the speculative cycle. There is no fundamental reason why housing could not round-trip to levels well below 100 on the Case-Shiller Index when the current bubble finally bursts.

If Mark Hanson's analysis is prescient, it may not require 3 years for the current housing bubble to implode; 2 years (2017) might be more than enough time for the speculative excesses to evaporate.


Source: HousingWire, Trey Garrison
http://www.housingwire.com/articles/33970-analyst-housing-bubble-not-a-question-of-if-but-when

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Are soaring housing costs forcing talent to flee Silicon Valley?

I'm rather bullish on long term prospect for this valley, but according to some this valley suffering more and more from it's own success. Some of this valley's top talent is leaving due to high housing costs. Great article and worth the read.


Soaring housing costs forces talent to flee Silicon Valley

At a recent conference, the founder of one technology titan asked another if it was even possible to build a platform-technology company outside of Silicon Valley. It was a fair question, given the dominance of Google, Facebook and Apple. But from where I sat, it seemed easier to build a company of that size today almost anywhere except Silicon Valley.

Others have had the same thought. A spate of start-ups and now venture funds have recently left Silicon Valley for LA (Snapchat), Chicago (Keepsake), Seattle (Sherbert) and even Ohio (Drive).

The company where I work, Redfin, understands this impulse better than anyone. We are real estate brokers, with technology used by 10 million-plus people each month looking to move. And the simplest trend we see in American life is that Silicon Valley is no longer just the place talented people move to; it's the place those people are moving from.

The dam has broken

In 2011, 1 in 7 people in the Bay Area searched Redfin.com for homes outside of the Bay Area. Now it's 1 in 4. As Adam Wiener, our chief growth officer, announced to other executives last month: "The dam has broken."

In the past four years, the number of Bay Area people searching for Seattle homes has quadrupled; for Portland homes, that number has quintupled. For every 13 Bay Area people searching for a home, one is now searching in the Pacific Northwest alone.

Where Bay Area People Search Redfin.com for Homes to Buy
Market
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Bay Area85.50%83.90%83.60%81.60%75.80%
Sacramento4.30%5.60%4.70%5.60%7.00%
Southern California6.00%5.60%4.80%5.50%5.20%
Seattle1.20%1.30%1.40%2.10%5.10%
Portland0.50%0.60%0.90%0.90%2.60%
Other2.50%2.90%4.60%4.30%4.40%
(Source: Redfin.com)
The new norm: 20% above asking price

And these aren't just idle online searches. One of our Denver employees had a simple answer for where she is now meeting our clients: "at the airport," with many flying in from northern California.

Silicon Valley transplants have become so common that Redfin's Boston agents just this week reported resentment among locals who can't compete. "My God, they are pouring in," Redfin's Boston broker, Alex Coon, wrote me this morning, "particularly in Cambridge and Somerville."

The result? According to Matt Zborezny, the Redfin agent for that area, 20 percent above asking price is the new norm.

Can't afford to stay

Folks are leaving Silicon Valley, mostly because they can't afford to stay. For the first time ever, the median price for a Silicon Valley home just exceeded $1 million. That's about double what it is in other tech cities, like Boston or Seattle, and triple what it is in aspiring technology hubs, like Portland, Denver or Austin.

Median home sales price
Market
Median Sales Price
Silicon Valley$1,050,000
Seattle$565,000
Boston$480,000
Portland$375,000
Denver$335,750
Austin$319,655
Chicago$292,000
(Source: Redfin.com)
Those in technology who can afford to stay in Silicon Valley all know it as one of the most beautiful places to live in the world, but a wariness has sunk in as folks from other walks of life are forced to leave: coffee shops are wall-to-wall with aspiring entrepreneurs, and restaurants buzz with talk of valuations and venture capital. It can be too much.

Just today a journalist who has covered technology from San Francisco for nearly a decade told me that people here seem more focused on money than in the past. If that's true, it isn't entirely by choice: People hop from job to job and deal to deal because sometimes that's the only way they can afford to stay.

A pay gap, but not big enough

According to compensation data company PayScale.com, Silicon Valley engineers earn nearly 50 percent more than their Boston counterparts; in Seattle that difference is smaller, but still significant, at 12 percent. Nowhere is the pay difference large enough to offset the cost of housing.

For these mostly entry-level jobs, the median level of experience is two to four years, with marketing managers at five to six years. At the most competitive companies, salaries are significantly higher.

In our own experience at Redfin employing engineers in Seattle and San Francisco, we've noticed that as Google, Facebook and Dropbox have opened Seattle offices, the differences in engineering pay, especially among recent graduates of top computer-science programs, have disappeared. But the pay of all the people responsible for the actual day-to-day operations of the business—in accounting, marketing or human resources—is more closely tied to the local cost of living. This is why, as Glassdoor reports today, the best places for jobs in America are now up-and-coming tech hubs like Raleigh and Austin, ranking ahead of San Jose or San Francisco.

Our board, which once encouraged us to pay whatever it takes to hire engineers in San Francisco, is now also asking if we want to explore opening engineering offices in Portland and Austin. Technologies such as Slack, SourceTree and Stash, and examples of purely virtual companies such as Automattic and GitHub, have made it easier than ever for people to contribute from anywhere. And those folks are more likely to stick around. The CEO of a publicly traded Internet company recently told me the people in his recently opened Midwest office see it "not just as a job but as a career."

Commercial rents are nearly double

Salaries aren't the only costs that are lower in other places. Silicon Valley commercial rents are nearly double what they would be in Denver or Portland, and 50 percent higher than Austin or Seattle. For a 100-person office, the difference is $400,000 a year, lowering operating expenses by about 2 percent; in a typical software company with 15 percent margins, this difference is significant.

Class A office space commercial rents
Market
Gross Rental Rate: $/Square Foot/Year
Annual Rent: 15,000 Square Feet
Silicon Valley$55.20$828,000
Boston$49.95$749,250
Chicago$41.00$615,000
Austin$36.27$544,050
Seattle$36.26$543,900
Portland$30.73$460,950
Denver$28.59$428,850
(Source: CBRE)
Many high-tech businesses are starting to worry about the rent: When we asked a CBRE broker, Owen Rice, for this data, he wrote back with a funny-that-you-should-ask email, noting that "more and more we are creating multimarket analyses for our clients," including those based in a suddenly more expensive Seattle, as well as the Valley.

Priceless innovation

But what about the original question—whether it's possible to build a technology platform company outside Silicon Valley. A platform company builds technology used by other technology companies, from the iPhone that runs other applications to the Facebook login we use to access other websites, compounding each employee's leverage. This is why Facebook's market value exceeds $20 million per employee.

These companies don't have to worry about expenses much. As my first mentor in Silicon Valley, Kirill Sheynkman, once explained to me at a French restaurant, the point in an innovation economy isn't to spend less, it's to make more. And for a platform company, the value of being close to the technology companies that build on your platform is priceless.

But as our industry matures, the pressure will be on profits, not just revenues. And few high-tech companies get as much leverage as Facebook from each employee. Even a platform company like Twitter is worth about four times less per employee than Facebook. With less equity to burn, Twitter has had to be the pacesetter in raising San Francisco engineering salaries, which is why its stock is now under so much earnings pressure. Only the techiest of tech companies—and only their tech people—don't feel the pinch.

Now of course, Silicon Valley isn't going to empty out. Its population remained constant over the last decade and will remain so again in this one. More people will come here, but more will leave, too. The result will be the Valley-fication of America, a form of gentrification more extreme than most of America has seen before, with high-tech jobs, high incomes and more expensive coffee, yoga studios and—yes—houses, too.

Source: CNBC, Glenn Kelman
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102697372

Exclusive: KB Home snaps up first piece of huge San Jose infill development site

On of America's largest builders, KB Homes, just completed the purchase of 9.8 acre piece of land on San Jose's Communications Hill. Communications Hill is hill, mostly unused that sits along highway 87 and Capitol Expressway in San Jose. There are already a number of residential units there, some of which I have viewed with buyer clients of mine, but now it seems that KB will basically be building on the remaining empty land. This is part of San Jose's master plan for the area.



The final buildout of Communications Hill, one of the largest and longest-running master-planned development projects in San Jose, is finally coming into view.

KB Home last week closed on a 9.8-acre chunk of land that will form the start of the massive project’s next phase — 154 units that will be joined by many hundreds more over the next 10 years. The first model homes, a mix of townhomes and small-lot single-family units, are expected to start construction this fall.

The deal is a major inflection point in the 35-year history of the Communications Hill plan, which called for up to 4,000 residential units, a 50-acre industrial park, a small retail center and wide swath of open space on the 400-foot-high hill. Public records show KB paid about $19.15 million for the site, or roughly $124,000 per unit.

“This was a huge milestone,” said Rob Bettencourt, general partner of MTA Properties, the family trust that owns most of the land on Communications Hill.

Backstory
Communications Hill is one of a handful of large, master-planned Silicon Valley development sites in infill locations that are finally getting built out as strong home prices tempt capital to place bets on these often complicated, pricey projects. Others include Wilson Meany and Stockbridge Capital’s Bay Meadows in San Mateo, on a former racetrack; KB Home on the San Jose Flea Market site near the under-construction Berryessa BART station; and Lennar Corp. on a 111-acre site next to the Warm Springs BART station in Fremont, also coming soon.

Communications Hill isn’t a redevelopment — the remaining land has been largely untouched since Manuel T. Azevedo arrived from Portugal basically penniless, bought a cow, and started the American Dairy Co. Cows grazed the property while a creamery in downtown San Jose processed the milk. (Now the hill sprouts microwave towers on its summit, visible from miles around on the valley floor.)

The Bettencourt family, descendants of Azevedo, has been working with the city of San Jose since the 1980s on the hill’s development, but construction didn’t start until the early 2000s. That’s when KB Home erected Tuscany Hills, a 760-unit project. SummerHill Homes later built about 400 homes on adjacent Dairy Hill.

The work stopped during the Great Recession, but KB never lost interest. It went back into contract on the land as the economy recovered, and received final approvals for the buildout plan last year that includes about 2,000 units.

The plan now is for KB to build all of those units, closing on development sites each year for the next 10 years. The phasing allows KB to lay in the infrastructure with each new chunk — a huge investment given the high costs of building on the hill.

“What KB was able to do is take that infrastructure and break it into phases,” Bettencourt said. “That made it a lot more attractive.”

Next steps
The next phase will start across from Adeline Avenue near Manuel Street and essentially extend the existing street network out. As KB sells out of the first 154 units, KB Home will start working on the next phase, which will be about 160 units.

“We are very excited to have closed on the initial phase of our Communications Hill community in San Jose,” Chris Apostolopoulos, president and regional general manager for KB Home Northern California said in a statement.

Apostolopoulos said crews would begin grading at the site in the next few weeks and start construction of model homes this coming fall.

“We plan to hold a grand opening for the community in early 2016 and anticipate the first homeowners will move in next summer,” he said.

Unique project
Among large suburban projects, Communications Hill is considered somewhat progressive, drawing its inspiration from San Francisco’s Telegraph Hill. Features include a rectilinear street grid and stairs that are sometimes too popular with visitors.

The new buildout plan will include attached townhomes, small-lot single-family homes and several taller stacked-flat buildings, some rising up to six stories. Design, from architecture firm KTGY, will transition from traditional Mediterranean-style aesthetic to very contemporary looks (see slideshow).

KB isn’t slated to acquire two significant pieces of the hill — a 55-acre site zoned for up to 1.4 million square feet of industrial space, and a 60,000-square-foot village center project. MTA will retain ownership of those locations, though KB Home will install all the infrastructure to make them viable, a major commitment. ( Read more about the industrial opportunity site here.)

Jerry Strangis, MTA’s longtime real estate agent, told me in an email it felt “great” to close a deal he’s been working on for 35 years. (His license plate actually references the hill.)

“The partnership with the city is the most gratifying part,” said Strangis, who heads up Strangis Properties. “The biggest challenge has and always has been the infrastructure improvements and how to phase it. That's were the city has been the most help.”

For Bettencourt, the sales and roadmap are both the culmination of years of work and perhaps a bit bittersweet.

“The property’s been in our family for four generations,” he said. “We’re always going to be attached to it.”


Source: Silicon Valley Business Journal, Nathan Donato-Weinstein
http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2015/05/05/exclusive-kb-home-snaps-up-first-piece-of-huge-san.html

Monday, May 25, 2015

Three ways to invest in a home and not get hurt


Buy low, sell high. That's the investor's maxim that never fails. The trick is in knowing when to buy and when to sell. Investing in a home is never as easy or as quick to deliver returns as you may wish. We all want to ride the boom and avoid the crash. Here are three ways to buy a home safely.

Don't try to time the market

Some homebuyers believe that waiting for prices or interest rates to go lower is the way to buy a home. But there are two things wrong with that approach.

First, what is the market going to do? Unless you have a crystal ball, it's hard to know. Between 2006 and 2011, home prices fell an annualized 7.7% a year, or 27%, according to Fiserv Case/Shiller. Since 2011 and 2014, they've gained back that much and more on an annual basis.

Mortgage interest rates follow the U.S. Treasury yields. A quarter point rise in interest rates will cost you roughly $25 more per month. Lock in an interest rate with your lender and don't second-guess yourself. You'll have more peace of mind as well as a stronger negotiating position with the seller.

Buy within your means

Irresponsible lending led to one of the biggest recessions in modern history. Many homeowners lost their homes. You don't want to join them by buying a home that's bigger, more luxurious or pricier than you can reasonably afford.

Lenders are facing heavy government penalties for lending to unqualified borrowers, so they're insisting that lending standards return to historically safe and sustainable parameters.

That means you won't be able to pay half your income toward housing which was common during the housing boom. Today, you'll pay approximately no more than a quarter to a third of your gross monthly income for a home.

As your income improves, your home becomes even more affordable, allowing you to meet other life goals, such as adding new members to your family or starting a business of your own.

Buy long term

The longer you own your home, the more equity you build. Equity is the percent of ownership you have in the home. Think of equity as money you'll get back when it's time to sell.

To protect your equity, reinvest in your home to keep it in top condition. Then when it's time to sell, your home will be more appealing to buyers and sell for more money than similar homes that aren't as updated or attractive.

If you buy a new home every few years, you'll throw away thousands in moving and closing costs. It's far better to hold on to your first home for as long as you can. At some point, you can turn it into a rental property that produces income for you.

Choose the best home you can for the money and it will return the favor.


Source: RealtyTimes, Blanche Evans
http://realtytimes.com/consumeradvice/buyersadvice1/item/35078-20150521-three-ways-to-invest-in-a-home-and-not-get-hurt

Happy Memorial Day from The Mimi Wang Team

HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY EVERYONE!





MIMI WANG
Realtor® GRI, SRES, CDPE, HAFA, REO, CCRM,  CalBRE #: 01775814
Century 21 M&M and Associates
10420 S. DeAnza Blvd.
Cupertino, CA. 95014 
Cell: (408) 569-3808
mimi@mimihomes.com www.mimihomes.com 
2014 President Women’s Council of Realtors 
Santa Clara Valley Chapter
Fluent in English, Mandarin, Cantonese and Vietnamese

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Tired Of Rending? It's Time To Buy A Home!

Your landlord is raising the rent. The neighbors are yelling at each other through paper-thin walls. You're a trembling jealous wreck because your best friends just bought a new home and it's awesome. Renting just isn't doing it for you anymore. Is it time to buy your next home?

The primary reason to buy a home is simply because you're ready. Homes are more affordable than they were 10 years ago, and you may be financially able as well as psychologically ready.

Perhaps you've taken a new job, married, or have a child on the way. You want more room for your family, or to live in a certain neighborhood close to work and other activities. To make your decision, you must weigh the pros and cons of renting VS owning so that you can achieve the lifestyle you want.

You know the typical arguments -- you have more freedom of movement as a renter but you build more personal wealth as a homeowner.

You can pick up and move when your lease is up, but the landlord won't let you have a pet and you can't choose the paint and carpet you prefer. As a property owner, your down payment and closing costs are significant, but it's yours to remodel or live in as you see fit.

When something breaks down, like the dishwasher, the landlord bears the repair or replacement costs. If you were in your own place, you'd choose whether to buy all new appliances so breakdowns won't be an issue for a few years.

As a renter, you just need to leave the place in the same condition as when you rented. As a homeowner, you're responsible for fixing, even if you've never picked up a wrench in your life. Or you'll have to hire a professional.

When you rent, you build equity for the landlord, not for yourself. When you own, your monthly mortgage payments go to reduce interest, which is income tax deductible. A portion of the payment goes to reduce the principal of your loan, allowing you to build equity ownership.



You may have to stay put for a while before you can sell your home at break-even or a profit, but you could also make enough to have a lot to put down on a bigger, better home down the road.

Renting was probably a good option while home prices were eroding during the recession, but affordability conditions favor buying now. In January 2015, rents rose 6.5 percent year-over-year, as much as home values increased for all of 2014.

While the population has continued to grow, housing units have not. New home building is two-thirds where it should be. With more new jobs added in April, competition for homes is heating up as renters are more able to afford to buy. Affordability has also been improved by near record-low mortgage interest rates for the last five years, and prime borrowing rates are still under four percent.

Yet many people are still afraid to buy, preferring the "security" of renting over the volatility of the housing market. If you're one of those, don't worry about short-term fluctuations and so-called corrections. Look at long-term trends -- that housing prices typically beat inflation, and that the tax advantages will more than allow you to profit from owning a home. And most important, that the home you buy will help you provide the surroundings you want for your household.


Source: Realtytimes, Blanche Evans
http://realtytimes.com/consumeradvice/buyersadvice1/item/35005-20150515-tired-of-renting-its-time-to-buy-a-home

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Saturday Stats

Happy Memorial Day Weekend Folks! Great market information report from MLSListings Inc.


MLSListings Real Estate and Housing Update
(Monterey, San Benito, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties)

Silicon Valley Inventory Gains, in Time for the Busy Summer Season
April 2015: Inventory Grows, Prices Maintain

A boost to the Silicon Valley summer buying and selling season with a reported growth in inventory. The MLSListings real estate update for April 2015 shows continued growth in one of the country’s most watched markets.

This is the second consecutive month pointing to a more competitive selling season. All reported counties showed gains in April for single-family inventory from March, except for San Mateo which only reported a 3% dip. However, San Mateo saw a 34% jump in inventory when compared year-over-year in April, and Santa Clara shows a 44% increase over that same time period. Huge jumps in an area that has been struggling recently with low inventory.

This jump in inventory could be leading to another new trend in the market, leveling median home prices. When compared year-over-year we again see sold gains in median price for all counties, but the entire market has seen great improvement in median price since a year ago. When compared month-over-month, median prices flattened out for the second month in a row with Santa Clara County having a 3% increase, the highest of all reported counties. But this shouldn’t slow down Silicon Valley’s growth as the market saw increased closed sales, more total dollars sold, and shorter days on market in April.





Source: MLS Listings, Inc.
http://www.mlslistings.com/media-center/resources/-market-data-reports/udt_931_param_detail/177

PDF Printable Version

Ready, Set, Sell: 3 Strategies for Getting Your Home Off the Market Fast

shutterstock_36188761
It’s possible to expedite your home’s sale … if you’re prepared to face the risks involved.

Most sellers have a specific goal when it comes to their transaction: a quick sale and top dollar. But sometimes fast action doesn’t align with achieving the highest and best value.

There are multiple schools of thought on this subject, and the perspective varies not only with where you are in the country, but also by price point, neighborhood and even down to the block. When it comes to pricing and the search for a quick sale, it’s always best to get help from a local agent.

Here are some strategies you can use to get offers fast.

The theory of under-pricing

Under-pricing means that you go to market with a list price that is just below what the comparable sales in your area support.

You can’t pinpoint the exact market value of a home until it sells. But before you list, there’s always a range. If you price your house at or below the bottom of the value range, you are under-pricing the home.

In many West Coast markets this strategy will work effectively. Take this San Francisco home, for example: priced at $1.1 million, it received 10 offers and sold for $1.425 million in less than a week.

Risk alert: If you price your home low, this plan could backfire — big time. If you don’t know your market and this strategy doesn’t work, you’d better be ready to accept that list price.

Staging and market presentation

Well-priced homes that also show well sell quickly. If you want a quick sale, you need to invest some serious time in getting the house ready.

Prepping the home means taking out large pieces of furniture and personal items, painting, replacing carpets, finishing floors and even doing some minor renovations.

Enlist the help of a home stager and take their advice, and you can be assured a quicker sale. The investment of time and money will pay itself back.

Risk alert: If you go overboard on staging or you don’t spend the time and money in the right places, it could be a waste. Don’t make staging decisions in a vacuum. Focus on kitchens and bathrooms, de-cluttering and cleaning. When in doubt, ask for help.

Disclose and inspect upfront

In most of the country, sellers complete real estate transfer disclosures and present them to the buyer, and the buyer simultaneously inspects the home — all once they are in escrow.

What often happens is that buyers discover things they don’t like, or uncover issues. When this happens, they may lose confidence in the home or the deal.

By presenting disclosures upfront, and even providing buyers with a copy of a recent inspection report, you can help them get more comfortable with the home. If you price the home to account for whatever work needs to be completed or for disclosure red flags, buyers will feel more confident, and may make an offer much more quickly.

Risk alert: There is little risk in disclosing and inspecting. If you try to hide something and the buyer discovers it later, you can expect the deal to fall apart — or maybe even face a lawsuit down the road.

Selling your home is a major undertaking. Spend time strategizing and preparing the home for the market. Pricing, staging, presentation and disclosure go hand in hand. If you want a quick sale, price it right, present it in its best possible light, and go out of your way to make buyers feel comfortable with all aspects of the home.


Source: Zillow Blog, Brendon Desimone
http://www.zillow.com/blog/get-your-home-off-the-market-fast-176288/

Friday, May 22, 2015

My branded water bottles

My Mimi Wang branded water bottles are here! I know they'll be a hit at open houses and with my clients.


San Francisco leads the nation in property bidding wars

Great article from HousingWire about the bidding wars going on in many real estate markets across the nation. 

As a nation, bidding wars gained steam heading into the spring home-buying, with 61% of offers written by Redfin agents facing competition from other buyers in March.

While this is up 57% from February, it is down slightly from 63% in March 2014.

Then compare this to two of California’s, and the nation's, hottest housing markets.

Both San Francisco and Ventura County not only fail to follow the trend but also are surging higher.

San Francisco’s bidding wars are nearly at 100%, rising from 88% last year to 94%, with 32% of homes selling over the asking price.

Although, Ventura’s bidding war percentage is one of the lowest in California, it is one of the fastest growing, moving from 33% last year to 54%.

Also, 19% of houses sell for more than the asking price.

Dwight Johnston, chief economist for the California Credit Union League, previously spoke with HousingWire on how the solution for first time homebuyers, while maybe obvious, is to save. The California market is not changing anytime soon, and rather than hope for a change, buyers need to play to the system.

“The Bay area has a vast amount of money that is driving a lot of the competition, and there is no supply in the market at all,” Johnston said about these new numbers. “The more desirable areas are built out, and they are all competing for the same houses at the same time. They have so much money that they don’t have to worry about being rational.”

“In Ventura, except for the fact it is one of the coastal communities, it usually doesn’t get quite that amount of traction. Anything that is coastal or has any special allure to it, you will see some bidding wars. This is what California has become,” he continued.

So what’s fueling the San Francisco’s housing market?

The tech bubble.

Since the tech industry continues to grow, Johnston explained that people can afford the expensive houses there, and as a result, builders will keep constructing nicer homes.

“In the coast areas of California, builders want to get the maximum square reach because it is so expensive to build here,” he said. “And you can’t blame them.”

Johnston explained it’s only if and when the tech bubble starts to stop being inflated that market might cool down.


Source: HousingWire, Brena Swanson
http://www.housingwire.com/articles/33790-san-francisco-leads-the-nation-in-property-bidding-wars