Showing posts with label hot housing market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hot housing market. Show all posts

Monday, August 15, 2016

Silicon Valley housing market is 'looney-tunes,' real estate broker says

Great article and video from CNBC about the craziness of the Silicon Valley housing market. As a Realtor, I have benefited from the hot housing market. The video below pretty much sums it up.


The housing market in Silicon Valley is "looney-tunes," real estate broker Fred Glick said Friday.

That's because it's all about supply and demand, with people flooding to the area from around the world.

"We just keep adding people like crazy and we can't get enough supply. That's why people have to share houses. That's why renters know that they have to pay an exorbitant amount of money," the CEO of real estate brokerages Arriva and U S Spaces said in an interview with CNBC's "Closing Bell."

The median home price is $1.1 million in San Francisco and $2.5 million in Palo Alto, according to Zillow.

 Pro on housing costs: LA and SF are 'Looney Tunes' Pro on housing costs: LA and SF are 'Looney Tunes'
Friday, 12 Aug 2016 | 4:15 PM ET|03:40
The housing market in Silicon Valley is "looney-tunes," real estate broker Fred Glick said Friday.

That's because it's all about supply and demand, with people flooding to the area from around the world.

"We just keep adding people like crazy and we can't get enough supply. That's why people have to share houses. That's why renters know that they have to pay an exorbitant amount of money," the CEO of real estate brokerages Arriva and U S Spaces said in an interview with CNBC's "Closing Bell."

The median home price is $1.1 million in San Francisco and $2.5 million in Palo Alto, according to Zillow.

Kelly Porter Real Estate
Erin Lubin | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Things have gotten so pricey that this week alone two high-profile people have been driven out of the Bay Area. San Francisco Federal Credit Union CEO Steven Stapp said he's taken another job in Portland, in large part because his rent in San Francisco is too high.

And a member of Palo Alto's planning commission, Kate Vershov Downing, posted a public letter of resignation on Medium, saying she and her family can't afford the $6,200 rent of a house they share with another family.

Glick said the real estate market is a local issue, with different cities facing different conditions. In Philadelphia, for example, it is "generically busy," with houses in good areas with good prices being snapped up quickly. In Tuscan, Arizona, however, there is two to three months of inventory for houses under $300,000, he said. And Houston has an overbuilt luxury problem, he said.

"It depends on where you go," said Glick.

One thing that won't impact the market will be if mortgage rates rise, he said.

"Mortgage rates don't matter because the way it is, you are thrilled to be a mortgage," he said, noting that it is a nightmare getting mortgages approved.

"If the rates go up, people take a five-year ARM instead of a 30-year fixed," he said.

Source: CNBC, Michelle Fox
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/12/silicon-valley-housing-market-is-looney-tunes-real-estate-broker-says.html

Friday, June 24, 2016

California's skyrocketing housing costs, taxes prompt exodus of residents



This article is not much of a surprise to me. Although as a Realtor I have benefited from the hot housing market, which is the result of the hot job market, it is starting to have negative consequences for the Silicon Valley and California. Many residents had enough and want out. Just recently I signed a listing agreement with seller clients of mine who want to sell their San Jose home so they can move to Oregon. How long will this bleeding of residents from California will continue? What can be done about it? No one has a clear answer.


Living in San Jose, Kathleen Eaton seemingly had it all: a well-paying job, a home in a gated community, even the Bay Area's temperate weather.

But enduring a daily grind that made her feel like a "gerbil on a wheel," Eaton reached her limit.

Faced with the exorbitant rising costs of Bay Area living, Priya Govindarajan and Ajay Patel pack up their apartment in San Francisco, Calif., ThursdaySkyrocketing costs for housing, food and gasoline, along with the area's insufferable gridlock, prompted the four-decade Bay Area resident to seek greener pastures -- 2,000 miles away in Ohio.

"It was a struggle in California," Eaton said. "It was a very difficult place to live. ... It's a vicious circle."

Eaton is far from alone.

A growing number of Bay Area residents -- besieged by home prices, worsening traffic, high taxes and a generally more expensive cost of living -- believe life would be better just about anywhere else but here.

During the 12 months ending June 30, the number of people leaving California for another state exceeded by 61,100 the number who moved here from elsewhere in the U.S., according to state Finance Department statistics. The so-called "net outward migration" was the largest since 2011, when 63,300 more people fled California than entered.

"The main factors are housing costs in many parts of the state, including coastal regions of California such as the Bay Area," said Dan Hamilton, director of economics with the Economic Forecasting Center at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks.

"California has seen negative outward migration to other states for 22 of the last 25 years."

A recent poll revealed that an unsettling sense of yearning has descended on people in the Bay Area: About one-third of those surveyed by the Bay Area Council say they would like to exit the nine-county region sometime soon.

"They are tired of the expense of living here. They are tired of the state of California and the endless taxes here," said Scott McElfresh, a certified moving consultant. "People are getting soaked every time they turn around."

The area's sizzling job market and robust economy have created a domino effect: income spikes for highly trained workers, more people packing the area's roads, red-hot demand for housing.

What's more, the technology boom has unleashed a hiring spree that has intensified the desire for homes anywhere near the job hubs of Santa Clara County, the East Bay and San Francisco. The South Bay job market has hit an all-time high after a 5,800-position surge in May, fueling an overall gain of 3,400 jobs for the Bay Area, according to a state labor report released Friday.

The region's soaring housing prices are a key factor driving dissatisfied residents toward the exit door. Several people who have departed, or soon will leave, say they potentially could have hundreds of thousands of dollars left over even after buying a house in their new locations.

"They're taking advantage of the housing bubble right now," McElfresh said. "The majority of the people we are seeing are moving to states that don't have state income taxes."

Thomas Norman, of San Francisco, said he and his wife, Patricia, are seriously considering leaving the Bay Area. They have actively scouted for houses in the Rocky Mountains region, including a trip to Colorado to look for prospective homes.

"The inconvenience of the Bay Area is a major factor," said Thomas Norman, a lifelong Bay Area resident burdened by a two-hour round-trip commute to an East Bay optometry practice. "The traffic is very bad. It is becoming more congested with all the housing that is being added here."

Eaton, who left the South Bay to relocate near Dayton, Ohio, cited the high cost of living as a major factor driving her decision. The struggle to make ends meet became too much.

"You can't get ahead," Eaton said. "It's more than the cost of living; it's the high taxes."

Eaton and her sister had a $724,000 house in The Villages in South San Jose that they sold before moving to Ohio. Their mortgage payments were $2,200 a month, plus $1,000 for association fees in the gated community. They were able to pay $300,000 in cash for their new home in Ohio.

Priya Govindarajan, a San Francisco resident, is planning to leave the Bay Area at the end of June and head with her husband, Ajay Patel, to North Carolina.

Govindarajan, who works in the consumer packaged goods industry, and her husband, who is in the medical profession, determined that their wages aren't going far enough to cover their living expenses.

Living in UC San Francisco housing, the couple pays $2,100 a month in rent. And they have to cough up $1,900 a month for child care.

"My husband's salary would be in the six figures, but six figures is not enough to cover the rent, day care (and) food prices," Govindarajan said. "It all starts to add up."

Govindarajan said she figures they can put down 20 percent on a nice house in North Carolina and have a monthly payment of $1,800 -- which would include the mortgage, property taxes and insurance.

"I get why people want to live in the Bay Area, I really do," Govindarajan said. "But it is so difficult to live here, especially for people coming here for the first time."

Some experts believe the boom in the Bay Area has exacerbated the problem of income inequality and the resentment that can accompany that economic reality.

"There is a declining middle class in the Bay Area," said Christopher Hoene, executive director of the California Budget & Policy Center, a research group that recently completed a study about income inequality in Silicon Valley. "Widening income inequality can create polarization socially and economically."

In 1989, the middle class accounted for 56 percent of all households in Silicon Valley, but by 2013, that share had slipped to 45.7 percent, the study found.

"The region's middle class has shrunk, while the numbers of lower-income and higher-income households has grown," the report stated. Silicon Valley, for the purposes of the study, consists of Santa Clara County, San Mateo County and San Francisco.

Lower-income residents accounted for 30.3 percent of Silicon Valley's households in 1989, and that number grew to 34.8 percent in 2013. Upper-income residents had 13.7 percent of the share of households in 1989, and that figure swelled to 19.5 percent in 2013, the study found.

"A lot of middle-class jobs have vaporized," said Russell Hancock, president of San Jose-based Joint Venture Silicon Valley. "The support positions, the assembly line positions, the jobs that paid the middle class -- a lot of those have gone away."

A big chunk of the jobs that are being created in the Bay Area are in the high-tech sector, which requires specialized skill sets to fill them. When jobs that would cater to the middle class wane, that can force people to relocate -- in many cases, out of the Bay Area entirely.

"This summer, I have booked more business than in any of the other 27 years that I've been working," said McElfresh, the moving consultant. "People are packing up and leaving."

Eaton, while happy to have escaped the high cost of living and traffic, recently found herself longing for one Bay Area staple -- its mild weather.

"There's a huge thunderstorm overhead," Eaton said while talking to a reporter. "Got to get used to that, I guess."

Source: Mercury News, George Avalos
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_30037774/greener-pastures-beckon-some-beleaguered-residents

Thursday, May 19, 2016

San Jose housing prices: County's median hits $1 million for first time



April 2016: Paul and Ruby Callary speak with their realtor Mark Wong before an open house  at their home of 27 years in San Jose, Calif. With high demand and a tight market, Bay Area housing prices continue to soar, setting record highs in April in Santa Clara and Alameda counties.

The median price of a single-family home in Santa Clara County hit seven figures for the first time last month: $1 million on the button. Prices grew even dizzier in San Mateo County, where the $1.2 million average matched the previous record, set in May 2015.

The East Bay also saw a run-up in prices, with the median Alameda County home reaching $750,000, up more than 10 percent from the previous month. Tugged upward by prices in Walnut Creek and other high-end areas, the median Contra Costa County price grew to $525,000, its steepest in seven years, according to new housing figures released Wednesday.

"We just don't have a market under $700,000 in Walnut Creek," said Alain Pinel agent Margaret Garber-Teeter. "And even at $700,000, you're going to be in second-tier schools. So there's still an affordability problem for young families, unless their parents help them, and a lot of young families get help."

Overall, the Bay Area's nine counties saw the median single-family home price rise to $725,000, just shy of the $738,500 peak of July 2007.

"It's the same story: The housing supply isn't keeping up with the demand," said Andrew LePage, research analyst for real estate information service CoreLogic, which released the latest numbers. "Mortgage rates remain low. The region's generating jobs. But you still have relatively low inventory, at least in the mid- and lower-priced markets, where most people are shopping."

The numbers reflect a crisis that is squeezing low-income earners and the middle class. According to a recent poll by the Bay Area Council, more than a third of the population, fed up with housing costs and endless commutes, are considering moving away.

While regional prices rose last month, the volume of sales fell from a year earlier: by 9.5 percent in Santa Clara County, 18.3 percent in San Mateo County, 13.1 percent in Alameda County, 5.1 percent in Contra Costa County and 9.5 percent for the nine-county region. It was the second consecutive month of year-over-year declines for the Bay Area.

Recognizing that there aren't enough houses to satisfy all the potential buyers, computer engineer Eugene Jong sensed a seller's market and worked it to his advantage.

Two years ago, he and his wife, Linda, also an engineer, moved from their San Jose townhouse to a single-family home in Los Gatos.

He watched as San Jose prices kept rising. Then in April, he pulled the trigger, listing the 1,250-square-foot townhouse for $599,950: "The open house was a month ago. The first day, 100 people came. The second day, about 50 more came. I had some numbers in mind in terms of the selling price -- what would be average and what would make me feel really happy. And it ended up that the price was way above the price where I felt really happy."

The townhouse drew 15 offers over the asking price and sold in seven days for $665,000.

Alain Pinel agent Mark Wong, who negotiated the sale, said it was a matter of good timing: If Jong had delayed and listed his townhouse in May, his fortunes might now be up in the air -- at least in part because the amount of inventory is "creeping up" and softening competition.

"The market is shifting right now," Wong said. "The market is really mixed. Some people are getting multiple offers, some are getting no buyers. Just in one month, the market has changed a lot."

High prices "are the new normal," said Julie Ray, a Coldwell Banker agent in Redwood City, "and fabulous houses with curb appeal" still get grabbed up. But "buyers are getting more picky. The inventory has come up to a level where people say, 'You know what? This one I'm not going to bid on, because it's not what I want.' "

In Contra Costa County, Garber-Teeter agreed that May has brought "a leveling" to the market. In more affordable areas -- she mentioned northern Concord, near Pittsburg -- inventory has opened up to the point that "the market is softening, homes are sitting."

Even in desirable Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda and Walnut Creek, she said, "We do have a little more inventory, but then you have to weed through that and find the few that are ready to go."

Expecting stiff competition in April, Garber-Teeter helped clients Tom and Heather Young "get all their ducks in a row" in order to sell their Walnut Creek house and buy a new one in Orinda.

They had purchased the Walnut Creek home, a fixer-upper, for $475,000 in 2009, and spent $225,000 on improvements. Last month, they listed it at $985,000, held open houses on two consecutive weekends, then took offers on the Tuesday after: "We had multiple offers and a buyer that night," said Tom Young, who runs an online advertising company and works at home.

The selling price: $1,070,000.

Last month, they also bought their new place in Orinda: four bedrooms, four baths and 3,700 square feet on a hillside with 100-year-old oak trees and "tons of wildlife."

It listed at $1,350,000. Their bid -- for $1,475,000 -- was one of five. The seller went with a higher offer, but the deal fell out of escrow. The seller then approached a second buyer, who dropped out, leaving the Youngs as main contenders. They had lined up those ducks, showing liquid funds and pitching the seller with a persuasive letter and a photo of their 6-month-old baby.

Now in his new home, Tom Young called last month "the most stressful period of my life, not because anything terrible happened, but because there were an overwhelming number of scenarios to think through and my brain got pretty busy. Now I'm waking up in a brand new place."

Source: San Jose Mercury News, Richard Scheinin
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_29908398/record-high-bay-area-homes-april

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Tech boom spurs San Jose housing, office, retail towers

One of two artist renderings of an office tower at 333 W. San Fernando St. in San Jose, Calif., which will have 725,000 square feet of office space in a

SAN JOSE -- The tech boom in Silicon Valley has spurred proposals for new high-rise projects in downtown San Jose that will bring housing, offices and retail, developers said Monday.

At 225 W. Julian St. near Highway 87, developers are planning a pair of 20-story residential towers that would bring 910 residential units into downtown San Jose, along with offices and retail uses. Nearby, developers want to build a 19-story office tower totaling 725,000 square feet at 333 W. San Fernando St. in a development that would also include retail uses on the ground floor.

The technology boom and job gains in North San Jose and other parts of Silicon Valley, along with growing interest by tech companies to move into the increasingly busy downtown, has fueled both efforts.

"If you look at what is happening here, downtown San Jose has really changed, and we are close to a tipping point for downtown becoming very dynamic," said Mark Lazzarini, managing principal with DAL Properties, which believes its efforts at 222 W. Julian St. could ride that new wave.

More than any other factor, the remarkable surge in technology hiring by big tech companies such as Apple and Google, along with major players such as Samsung, have helped bolster plans by real estate developers to bring new projects into the downtown.

"We believe we can get a single tenant in our project" at 333 W. San Fernando St., said John DiNapoli, president of developer J.P. DiNapoli Cos. "We think this can be a tech tenant."

The 333 W. San Fernando complex will feature an amenity deck on the 18th floor of the tower, an outdoor level that is expected to appeal to technology tenants.

"You have so many more restaurants, hotels, along with entertainment and cultural activities, that downtown San Jose is becoming the place to live, work and play," Lazzarini said.

Another major effort to bring a tech company into new offices in downtown San Jose is being led by developer Trammell Crow. The realty firm is planning 1 million square feet of offices, housing and retail that will include a tech campus for a major tenant in a development planned for an area near the Guadalupe River not far from the SAP sports complex and the Diridon transit station.

San Jose's expansion efforts, led by former Mayor Chuck Reed and current Mayor Sam Liccardo, appear to be paying off for the downtown district.

"The city has created a job center in North San Jose, and the development and expansion activity there is making it more difficult for tech companies to find large blocks of space there," said Mark Haney, a blogger who writes about the downtown at the Think Bigger San Jose website.

The other part of the city's strategy is to encourage multiple kinds of development in downtown San Jose.

"For downtown, the challenge is what would be first, the companies or the residences," Haney said. "The residences have been built and are being built, and now it's starting to pencil out for developers to build offices for tech tenants."

What's more, the tech boom and residential boom in San Francisco's downtown and South of Market districts -- along with the move of tech firms such as Pandora Media, Sungevity and Uber Technologies -- has made urban centers more appealing to young tech workers.

"People are finding it more interesting to live in downtown areas," Haney said.

Source: San Jose Mercury News, George Avalos
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_29870047/tech-boom-spurs-san-jose-housing-office-retail

Listing Your Home? How to Avoid Seller's Remorse

shutterstock_383132335

In many real estate markets around the country, inventory is low and sellers are in the driver’s seat again.

In some cases, homes are selling for more than asking price. After years of a sluggish buyers’ market, many real estate agents are trying to get would-be sellers to list their homes now.

It seems like a great time to sell. But how can you know for sure if it’s a great time for you to sell?

If you experience buyer’s remorse, you can usually get out of a contract through contingencies or other out clauses. If you start to feel seller’s remorse, you don’t have that luxury. So you must be certain you’re ready to sell before you sign the contract —or, better yet, before you list the property.

To avoid seller’s remorse, and to make the sales process go as smoothly as possible, keep these strategies in mind.

Develop a solid pricing strategy

Agents often encourage their sellers to list their homes competitively, so that the market receives it well. Sometimes sellers see that as the agent pushing for a quick sale. But often, it’s truly the agent looking out for the seller’s best interests.

Whatever the scenario, pricing is the most important discussion a seller can have with an agent. When there’s a disconnect on price, raise it as a red flag from the get-go. If you find yourself resisting your agent’s suggested price, talk through the options or get a second opinion.

You might try starting out with a higher number. This might be against your agent’s better judgment, but it can be worth a shot. If there’s no activity in the first few weeks, you can always reduce the price.

Alternatively, sellers who increase their asking price after the home has gone on the market are often seen as frenetic, lacking a strategy and having a clear disconnect with their agent.

Bottom line: If you haven’t had a serious pricing discussion with your agent or you aren’t sold on your list price, don’t go on the market.

Have a clear post-sale plan

The sellers of an Essex, CT home heard the market there was hot and that they could get the price they had tried but failed to get just six months earlier. They’d already done the appropriate clearing out, painting, and fix-it work, and even had the property inspected. So, for them, going on the market was easy.

However, they didn’t expect to receive three offers, all of them above the asking price, within hours of their first open house. The buyers they chose wanted to close in 30 days.

The problem: The sellers had nowhere to go. They didn’t have a plan. Like many sellers today, they heard the market was healthy again. And after dreaming for years of finally getting what their home is worth, they jumped in while “the getting is good” without thinking it all the way through.

Be ready to negotiate with buyers

Feeling strong and in the driver’s seat, the Essex homeowners decided to wait and see if they could get terms that would suit them better. The sellers’ listing agent negotiated a quick close with a 30-day-free rent-back and another 30 days rent, in which the sellers would pay the new buyer’s PITI (Principal, Interest, Taxes and Insurance). It was a win-win for all.

While this couple in Essex had the luxury of a competitive bidding situation, it may not always be the case. That’s why having a clear plan in place for all conceivable outcomes and a willingness to negotiate can help you get through the sale process successfully.

When in doubt, stay out

Home selling is happening quickly in many parts of the country. While this is great news for the housing market and most homeowners, sellers need to plan for the sale months in advance. Hooking up with a good local agent early on in the process and staying engaged is the best way to approach this new market.

If you have any doubts about your physical or financial situation, hold off on listing. Watch from the sidelines, and only jump in when you’re truly ready. The biggest mistake a seller can make is to go on the market and fail to sell — at a time when everything else is selling.

Source: Zillow Porchlight, Brendon Desimon
http://www.zillow.com/blog/avoiding-sellers-remorse-123175/

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Bay Area home sales in March: up from February, down from a year earlier



Bay Area home sales rose markedly from February to March as 6,754 homes sold across the nine counties, a 37 percent month-over-month increase. However, sales were down on a year-over-year basis by 2.9 percent.

Overall, it was the second slowest March since 2009. Only March 2014 was slower.

"Last month the housing market experienced a normal, seasonal spike from February in the number of recorded transactions, which reflects more buyers and sellers entering the market as the holidays and winter faded," said Andrew LePage, research analyst with CoreLogic, which crunched the numbers.

"However, sales fell slightly year over year -- for only the second time in the past year -- and they were about 21 percent below the average March sales tally since the late 1980s. This suggests that despite the improved economy and still-low mortgage rates, many would-be buyers continue to face hurdles such as waning affordability, moderately tight credit and a relatively slim inventory of homes for sale in many communities."

The median price for homes sold in the Bay Area in March -- single family homes and condominiums -- was $643,250, up 4.6 percent from the previous month. It was also up 1.4 percent from March 2015. The median sale price has now risen year-over-year for 48 months in a row. However, that 1.4 percent gain was the smallest for any month since the median sale price began its unbroken year-over-year rise four years ago.

LePage noted that sales activity was notably brisk last month -- up a combined 7.3 percent -- in the four most affordable inland counties: Contra Costa, Solano, Napa and Sonoma. However combined sales in the four most expensive counties -- San Francisco, Santa Clara, San Mateo and Marin -- fell by nearly nine percent.

The median sale price rose year-over-year by 1.7 percent in Alameda County to $630,250 and by 8.3 percent to $503,750 in Contra Costa County. In Santa Clara County, the median price was up by 9.2 percent to $830,000, while the median fell by 0.6 percent to $954,000 in San Mateo County.

Source The San Jose Mercury News, Richard Scheinin
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_29786036/bay-area-home-sales-march-up-from-february

Monday, April 4, 2016

The 20 Hottest Housing Markets This Spring

Two of the top housing markets in the United States are in the Bay Area, one of which is in the Silicon Valley; San Jose. Great news for our market here. Great news if you are a seller!

The 20 Hottest Housing Markets This Spring
California continues to dominate the latest list of some of the busiest housing markets across the country. The Golden State boasts 13 of the 20 top markets. Some Eastern markets like Boston and Raleigh, N.C. are also making a comeback.

Realtor.com® identified the 20 hottest medium- to large-size housing markets for March. They analyzed the number of listing views per market (to show demand) and median days on the market (to show supply). According to their preliminary site data, housing inventory is down 2 percent year-over-year, which is making things quite competitive in many markets.

“Listings are growing as they normally do this time of the year, but because demand has been growing faster than supply, homes are selling faster,” says Jonathan Smoke, chief economist of realtor.com. “So the monthly trend is the normal seasonal pattern, but the year-over-year decline is reflective of demand being stronger than supply for more than a year, which is resulting in fewer homes available and faster-moving inventory.”

This ranking shows the 20 markets where listings are getting two to five times more views than the national average and homes are selling one to two months faster than in the rest of the country:


Source: Realtor Mag Online > Realtor.com
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2016/03/31/20-hottest-housing-markets-spring?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BW-ZpfB9MRHMlq&om_ntype=RMODaily

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Banks Want More Owners to Tap Into Equity

As home prices rise, banks are touting home-equity lines of credit (HELOCs), trying to get more home owners to take equity out of their homes.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. started contacting customers in January, marketing the benefits of cash-out refinances for making home repairs, debt consolidation, and tuition payments. PNC Financial Services Group Inc. also increased its marketing on HELOCs.

Read more: 1 Million Borrowers Regained Equity Last Year
But TD Bank may have the most unusual approach. The bank has sponsored a tour bus that travels to hardware stores along cities in the East Coast that invites home owners to step in, grab an iPad, and fill out an application on the spot.

The bank “is placing a bet…home equity will play a bigger part of our business,” Mike Kinane, senior vice president of home-equity lending at TD Bank, told The Wall Street Journal.

A growing number of banks are trying to offset a recent decrease in mortgage originations and refinancings by trying to ramp up a more robust home-equity lines of credit business. They are hoping to hook home owners who are looking to renovate or need cash for other expenses.

Last year, lenders extended more than $156 billion in home-equity lines of credit – the largest amount since 2007, according to data from CoreLogic. The average line of credit extended to home owners last year reached a record-breaking $119,790, according to CoreLogic’s data, which dates back to 2002.

“Lenders are opening up their spigots,” says Sam Khater, deputy chief economist at CoreLogic.

Still, the volume of HELOCs is well-below what it was during the housing boom. At that time, lenders were extending more than $300 billion in credit lines a year – about half of what they currently are extending.

This time around banks also are requiring higher credit scores and in the majority of the cases, borrowers must have at least 20 percent of equity in their home after receiving the credit line. The average FICO score for borrowers who received a home-equity line of credit was 781 in the fourth quarter of 2015, according to Black Knight Financial Services data.

Source: Realtor.com > Wall Street Journal
http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2016/03/29/banks-want-more-owners-tap-equity?om_rid=AAFmZk&om_mid=_BW$sPQB9ML-H7r&om_ntype=RMODaily

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

What to Do If You Get an Offer ... But Your Home Isn't for Sale

shutterstock_96182147
It’s the knock on the door that comes out of left field. Or the unexpected envelope in the mail. A stranger says he wants to buy your house, and for a great price.

Or what’s even more common is that a friend of a friend or acquaintance approaches you about her desire to purchase your home.

What should you do when you receive an offer from a buyer when your home isn’t even on the market? It happens more than you would think, and it’s helpful to consider your options, whether you’ve thought about selling or not.

Why does this happen?

While you go about your day-to-day business and enjoy your home, able-and-ready buyers are desperate to be homeowners. In many parts of the country, inventory for homes is still at all-time lows.

Quite frankly, there just aren’t enough options for buyers, so they have to think outside the box.  Some aggressive buyers take matters into their own hands, mailing letters to homes in their desired neighborhoods and hoping for a winner.

What do you do?

If you have no desire whatsoever to sell your home, do nothing. But some homeowners will want to hear what the buyers have to say, while others might seriously consider an off-market offer.

Your first step is simply to listen. You’ll want to vet the prospective buyer over the phone to make sure they’re serious.

Ask how long they’ve been looking, if they’ve made other offers already, and what their desired areas are.

Then ask them why they chose your home. A buyer who mails an offer to you and only you probably really wants your home, as opposed to those buyers sending postcards to 50 people.

Hear them out and better understand their motivations, experience in the market, and possible price or terms, if any.

You will likely need to show them the home. If they seem serious, take that step, but be cautious letting a stranger into your home.

Enlisting a real estate agent

If you used the help of an excellent local agent when you purchased your home, you might want to re-engage them at some point.

While buyers and sellers dream of consummating a deal and saving money on real estate commissions, it’s often a better strategy to consult with an honest and experienced agent. A good agent looks out for the long-term relationship, and being an adviser to an off-market sale is in their best interest as well.

Many agents will assist in an off-market deal for a reduced commission, since they don’t have to prepare and show the home for weeks or months.

Off-market deals may not pan out

These deals don’t always come to fruition for a variety of reasons — frequently, it’s because the seller isn’t motivated enough to let the property go.

And in nearly every off-market deal, there’s a struggle over the last few thousand dollars — and that conflict often keeps the sale from happening.

The buyer wants a discount, because they know the seller isn’t paying a real estate commission. The seller wants their market value because the home is worth what the home is worth. Both parties wish to benefit from the commission savings.

In most cases, if the buyer wants to buy, they need to pony up. The seller has what they want, and purchasing off the market is, in some ways, an opportunity they need to pay for.

Source: Zillow Blog, Brendon Desimone
http://www.zillow.com/blog/what-if-you-get-an-off-market-offer-191158/

Friday, December 11, 2015

Tiny cottage on what may be smallest plot of land in San Francisco goes on sale for whopping $599,000

This article, I hate to say, is very indicative of the white hot real estate market here in the San Francisco Bay area. It does't mean there's no good value properties out there and there's no hope for first time home buyers on a budget because the market won't stay this way forever.

Pricey: The 830-sq-ft cottage in the Sutro Heights area of San Francisco stands on what could be the city's smallest lot but still costs $599,000


  • The 830-square-foot two-level cottage has just gone on the market
  • It has two levels and the two bedrooms are the size of large closets
  • The home may have the smallest lot in San Francisco', according to the agent
  • Despite its diminutive size, its price-tag is a whooping $599,000
  • Realtor says that she's already had 300 viewers


A single-family home in San Francisco that stands on the 'city's smallest lot' has hit the market for a whopping $599,000.

The tech hub regularly tops the list of the most expensive cities to live in, and the expensive 830-square-foot cottage - as large as most one-bedroom apartments - proves the area is not becoming cheaper any time soon.

The 1916 two-bedroom, two-floor white cottage at 544 46th avenue in coveted Sutro Heights stands on a small 644-square-foot plot of land, with a neighbor crowding in on one side.

'There's such a backup of buyers in the $600,000 to $750,000 price range...like thousands and thousands of people who want to buy a place in San Francisco,' she told SF Gate.

'Most people in this price range are lucky if they're going to get a one-bedroom condo with monthly dues. This is a single standalone with no HOA dues. It's an affordable price point that's hard to come by.'

The cottage was once owned by silver baron and city mayor Adolph Sutro, and Stolz thinks it was once used as a workshop.

Those who can overlook the confined space will enjoy the updated open kitchen with stainless steel appliances, granite countertops, chef's island and large, airy windows.

There's also a cute little porch with a view of the surrounding hills and the home is two blocks from Sutro Park.

Stolz says most prospective buyers are couples, single people, or artists looking for work space.

The lucky seller has owned the home for 13 years and moved to (much cheaper) Oregon.

The house is actually not a bad deal for the area - it is $722 per square foot, below the average price in San Francisco of $947, according to Trulia.

In September, an Outer Mission dilapidated 765-sq foot lean-to that would need to be completely torn down and renovated sold for $408,000 - $58,000 more than asking price.

Stolz says she is accepting offers starting on Friday.

Source: Daily Mail, Kiri Blakeley
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3353206/Tiny-830-square-foot-cottage-SMALLEST-plot-land-San-Francisco-goes-hits-market-599-000.html

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Are soaring housing costs forcing talent to flee Silicon Valley?

I'm rather bullish on long term prospect for this valley, but according to some this valley suffering more and more from it's own success. Some of this valley's top talent is leaving due to high housing costs. Great article and worth the read.


Soaring housing costs forces talent to flee Silicon Valley

At a recent conference, the founder of one technology titan asked another if it was even possible to build a platform-technology company outside of Silicon Valley. It was a fair question, given the dominance of Google, Facebook and Apple. But from where I sat, it seemed easier to build a company of that size today almost anywhere except Silicon Valley.

Others have had the same thought. A spate of start-ups and now venture funds have recently left Silicon Valley for LA (Snapchat), Chicago (Keepsake), Seattle (Sherbert) and even Ohio (Drive).

The company where I work, Redfin, understands this impulse better than anyone. We are real estate brokers, with technology used by 10 million-plus people each month looking to move. And the simplest trend we see in American life is that Silicon Valley is no longer just the place talented people move to; it's the place those people are moving from.

The dam has broken

In 2011, 1 in 7 people in the Bay Area searched Redfin.com for homes outside of the Bay Area. Now it's 1 in 4. As Adam Wiener, our chief growth officer, announced to other executives last month: "The dam has broken."

In the past four years, the number of Bay Area people searching for Seattle homes has quadrupled; for Portland homes, that number has quintupled. For every 13 Bay Area people searching for a home, one is now searching in the Pacific Northwest alone.

Where Bay Area People Search Redfin.com for Homes to Buy
Market
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Bay Area85.50%83.90%83.60%81.60%75.80%
Sacramento4.30%5.60%4.70%5.60%7.00%
Southern California6.00%5.60%4.80%5.50%5.20%
Seattle1.20%1.30%1.40%2.10%5.10%
Portland0.50%0.60%0.90%0.90%2.60%
Other2.50%2.90%4.60%4.30%4.40%
(Source: Redfin.com)
The new norm: 20% above asking price

And these aren't just idle online searches. One of our Denver employees had a simple answer for where she is now meeting our clients: "at the airport," with many flying in from northern California.

Silicon Valley transplants have become so common that Redfin's Boston agents just this week reported resentment among locals who can't compete. "My God, they are pouring in," Redfin's Boston broker, Alex Coon, wrote me this morning, "particularly in Cambridge and Somerville."

The result? According to Matt Zborezny, the Redfin agent for that area, 20 percent above asking price is the new norm.

Can't afford to stay

Folks are leaving Silicon Valley, mostly because they can't afford to stay. For the first time ever, the median price for a Silicon Valley home just exceeded $1 million. That's about double what it is in other tech cities, like Boston or Seattle, and triple what it is in aspiring technology hubs, like Portland, Denver or Austin.

Median home sales price
Market
Median Sales Price
Silicon Valley$1,050,000
Seattle$565,000
Boston$480,000
Portland$375,000
Denver$335,750
Austin$319,655
Chicago$292,000
(Source: Redfin.com)
Those in technology who can afford to stay in Silicon Valley all know it as one of the most beautiful places to live in the world, but a wariness has sunk in as folks from other walks of life are forced to leave: coffee shops are wall-to-wall with aspiring entrepreneurs, and restaurants buzz with talk of valuations and venture capital. It can be too much.

Just today a journalist who has covered technology from San Francisco for nearly a decade told me that people here seem more focused on money than in the past. If that's true, it isn't entirely by choice: People hop from job to job and deal to deal because sometimes that's the only way they can afford to stay.

A pay gap, but not big enough

According to compensation data company PayScale.com, Silicon Valley engineers earn nearly 50 percent more than their Boston counterparts; in Seattle that difference is smaller, but still significant, at 12 percent. Nowhere is the pay difference large enough to offset the cost of housing.

For these mostly entry-level jobs, the median level of experience is two to four years, with marketing managers at five to six years. At the most competitive companies, salaries are significantly higher.

In our own experience at Redfin employing engineers in Seattle and San Francisco, we've noticed that as Google, Facebook and Dropbox have opened Seattle offices, the differences in engineering pay, especially among recent graduates of top computer-science programs, have disappeared. But the pay of all the people responsible for the actual day-to-day operations of the business—in accounting, marketing or human resources—is more closely tied to the local cost of living. This is why, as Glassdoor reports today, the best places for jobs in America are now up-and-coming tech hubs like Raleigh and Austin, ranking ahead of San Jose or San Francisco.

Our board, which once encouraged us to pay whatever it takes to hire engineers in San Francisco, is now also asking if we want to explore opening engineering offices in Portland and Austin. Technologies such as Slack, SourceTree and Stash, and examples of purely virtual companies such as Automattic and GitHub, have made it easier than ever for people to contribute from anywhere. And those folks are more likely to stick around. The CEO of a publicly traded Internet company recently told me the people in his recently opened Midwest office see it "not just as a job but as a career."

Commercial rents are nearly double

Salaries aren't the only costs that are lower in other places. Silicon Valley commercial rents are nearly double what they would be in Denver or Portland, and 50 percent higher than Austin or Seattle. For a 100-person office, the difference is $400,000 a year, lowering operating expenses by about 2 percent; in a typical software company with 15 percent margins, this difference is significant.

Class A office space commercial rents
Market
Gross Rental Rate: $/Square Foot/Year
Annual Rent: 15,000 Square Feet
Silicon Valley$55.20$828,000
Boston$49.95$749,250
Chicago$41.00$615,000
Austin$36.27$544,050
Seattle$36.26$543,900
Portland$30.73$460,950
Denver$28.59$428,850
(Source: CBRE)
Many high-tech businesses are starting to worry about the rent: When we asked a CBRE broker, Owen Rice, for this data, he wrote back with a funny-that-you-should-ask email, noting that "more and more we are creating multimarket analyses for our clients," including those based in a suddenly more expensive Seattle, as well as the Valley.

Priceless innovation

But what about the original question—whether it's possible to build a technology platform company outside Silicon Valley. A platform company builds technology used by other technology companies, from the iPhone that runs other applications to the Facebook login we use to access other websites, compounding each employee's leverage. This is why Facebook's market value exceeds $20 million per employee.

These companies don't have to worry about expenses much. As my first mentor in Silicon Valley, Kirill Sheynkman, once explained to me at a French restaurant, the point in an innovation economy isn't to spend less, it's to make more. And for a platform company, the value of being close to the technology companies that build on your platform is priceless.

But as our industry matures, the pressure will be on profits, not just revenues. And few high-tech companies get as much leverage as Facebook from each employee. Even a platform company like Twitter is worth about four times less per employee than Facebook. With less equity to burn, Twitter has had to be the pacesetter in raising San Francisco engineering salaries, which is why its stock is now under so much earnings pressure. Only the techiest of tech companies—and only their tech people—don't feel the pinch.

Now of course, Silicon Valley isn't going to empty out. Its population remained constant over the last decade and will remain so again in this one. More people will come here, but more will leave, too. The result will be the Valley-fication of America, a form of gentrification more extreme than most of America has seen before, with high-tech jobs, high incomes and more expensive coffee, yoga studios and—yes—houses, too.

Source: CNBC, Glenn Kelman
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102697372

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Home sales, prices jump across Bay Area at start of spring buying season


The Bay Area's spring home-buying season had one of its best starts since the housing crisis.

April home sales in the Bay Area increased 13.5 percent from March totals and 2.4 percent from April 2014 sales. The 7,778 new and existing houses and condominiums sold in the region's nine counties is the second highest April total since 2006, only trailing April 2013, when 7,801 homes sold.

"April sales in the Bay Area were some of the highest we've seen for the month since the housing downturn, though they were still below average," said Andrew LePage, an analyst with CoreLogic, the real estate information service. "Many would-be buyers continue to be challenged by lingering credit hurdles, tight inventories of homes for sale and, of course, the drop in affordability over the past few years."

CoreLogic also reported that the median April price for Bay Area homes sold was $657,000, the highest since June and July 2007, when the median hit an all-time high of $665,000. In Santa Clara County, the median price grew to $800,250, and it increased elsewhere, too: $1,024,000 in San Mateo County, $640,000 in Alameda County and $480,500 in Contra Costa County.

"Prices aren't rising as fast as they were a year or two ago," LePage said, "but the median sale price has already reached record levels in some coastal counties."

By contrast, he pointed out that "in many inland areas, prices remain significantly below all-time highs, but they're also up sharply from their housing-bust lows.

"Home shoppers are no doubt hoping for a big boost in inventory, which would increase competition among sellers and slow the pace of price appreciation," LePage added.


Source: San Jose Mercury News, Richard Scheinin
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_28162254/home-sales-prices-jump-across-bay-area-at