Showing posts with label Cupertino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cupertino. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Cupertino? Nah, it's Apple Town


File photo:Apple’s famous address at 1 Infinite Loop in Cupertino, Calif. Editor's Note: A satirical argument for the company town.

You may have read recently that there is a wide assumption in Santa Clara political circles that the San Francisco 49ers are hoping to recruit a slate of sympathetic candidates to run for the City Council. As one of the most significant employers in town, the team hasn't really denied the reports.

Woeful as the players have been on the field, the Niners may be onto something profound. They just don't go far enough.

Why not drop the pretense and let corporate interests run our cities? Put another way, it's time to bring back the company town. It will make things far more efficient.

The first task in this badly needed makeover is changing the names. Santa Clara? The current name is probably a violation of church and state to begin with. Why not rename it Ninerdom. Mountain View? Who can see the mountains, anyway? Change it to Googleville.

Cupertino? Just make it Apple Town. Los Gatos? In honor of Netflix, call it Stream City. And Menlo Park? Now that Facebook has moved in, make it the warm and fuzzy "Friendvale.''

REBRANDING

Frankly, I see a lot of branding opportunities here. "Cupertino," for instance, traces its current name to a saint who came from the Italian town of Copertino. Does anyone know that? Of course not. But everyone knows Apple, one of the most famous companies in the world.

It's when you merge corporations with local government, however, that you see the real advantages of my plan.

We've all known for a while that Facebook and Google run a far more efficient transit system than our VTA. Once the companies run local parks, police and planning departments, the long waits we complain about will diminish.

Consider what this would mean for the average city council. Instead of tedious and expensive elections that make politicians captive to special interests, we can appoint representatives from corporate HR, marketing, engineering, finance and administration. The robustness of council debate won't suffer: God knows marketing and engineering already disagree.

EFFICIENCIES

In this new world, silly battles with NIMBY neighbors over projects like the "Grove," Neflix's expansion in Los Gatos -- excuse me, Stream City -- would come to a swift end.

Netflix's corporate leadership could simply decree that a building would happen. No more moaning about traffic. To deal with dissenters, it could call out the cops, who would get stock options and free subscriptions to work for the company.

Those fights about whether an official has a conflict of interest? A quaint thing of the past. There will be no conflicts. There's only one interest -- the corporation's.

Sure, I know there will be some doubters, some lily-livered ACLU types who resist change. Someone might suggest Apple Town would trample privacy in the interest, say, of collecting taxes. Someone else might say that Googleville would know too much about its residents.

But as long as this is done efficiently, people will forgive. My idea takes the concept of government "working at the speed of business" to its logical end.

To paraphrase Calvin Coolidge, government is business. And business is government. Let's play ball.

Source: San Jose Mercury News, Scott Herhold
http://www.mercurynews.com/scott-herhold/ci_30140154/cupertino-nah-its-apple-town

Friday, July 1, 2016

Pounding the pavement in Cupertino meeting homeowners

Here's a selfie pic that I took with my fellow Realtor friend Vendy Chan while were door knocking in Cupertino this past weekend in 90 degree + weather. We had a great time meeting a number potential home seller clients. 


Wednesday, April 6, 2016

‘Help, a McMansion Is Going Up Next Door!’

I can think of one neighborhood right here in Cupertino, not far from my office that has a number of McMansions. 

ranch and mcmansion

Janet Per Lee has lived in the same house in Mountain View, CA, for over 40 years. Built in the 1950s, her 1,000-square-foot ranch house is situated on a secluded quarter-acre with trees whose branches hang heavy with apricots, plums, pears, and figs, which she shares with her neighbors. Her three kids grew up playing in that yard, attending top-notch local schools. Although the kids are no longer living at home, Per Lee loves her community and, in a normal world, would never consider moving.

But this is no normal world. In fact, the Google headquarters is located less than a ten-minute drive away.

As this tech titan has grown exponentially, so has the neighborhood’s popularity. As houses in the area have gone up for sale, developers have bought them, bulldozed them, erected 4,000-square-foot mansions that are selling for over $3 million. In fact, eight years ago, it happened right next door to Per Lee, who learned the new house would fill the entire lot from front to back and tower over her own.

“It’s built so much higher than my house, virtually every window looks out into my backyard,” she says. Desperate to protect her privacy, she planted Italian cypress trees as a natural barrier. She tried to reason with the builder, whose unsympathetic response was: “Shouldn’t everyone be able to build their dream home?”

Big homes = big problem

What’s going on in Mountain View is an extreme version of a problem cropping up all over the country: Huge houses are being built on plots of land originally meant to accommodate smaller dwellings, sparking a heated debate over what’s best for the community. Some argue that owners of larger homes pay more taxes, which can benefit all. But if your home happens to have its air and light blocked by a behemoth next door, you would likely be very, very upset—and can most likely kiss the idea of cashing out on your home sale goodbye.

Those against the lenient building codes that allow for “mansionization” also argue that it negatively affects a community’s vibe.

“These houses are often akin to fortress walls on city streets,” contends Greg Goldin, curator at the A+D Architecture and Design Museum. “People in big houses tend to lead noncommunitarian, noncivic lives. These homes are the embodiment of their desire to turn their backs on the shared experience and common spaces of real city life. They are anti-city.”

That might sound extreme, but it’s exactly what Per Lee has experienced as her once-secluded pocket of Mountain View has evolved. Realtors® and developers advertise the vibrant community and shady tree-lined streets as a draw, but then chop down those trees to maximize building space on the lots—and once new owners move in she barely sees them out and about mingling with their neighbors.

Another factor: Homeowners believe they have the right to do as they please with their properties—especially when they’ve paid big money for their land.

“If people are paying millions for the dirt on which a teardown sits, they want to be able to make their own decisions regarding the housing,” explains Arthur Jeppe, a partner at Read & Jeppe in Newport Beach, CA.

Which is understandable, but shouldn’t they at least consider the impact on their immediate neighbors?

‘Neighborhoods need to evolve’

In Renton, WA, Robert Walker’s 1,000-square-foot bungalow came with a view of downtown Seattle’s skyline and Lake Washington. But in 2005, buyers purchased the home across the street from him and built a three-story, 4,000-square-foot house that blocked his whole view. Despite collecting signatures for a petition and arguing his case before Renton’s City Council, Walker got nowhere.

“The feeling definitely seemed to be that being a place that’s attractive to stable homeowners was more important than regulating what’s being built,” says Walker.

A similar drama is playing out in Arcadia, CA, where more than 30 homes larger than 5,000 square feet (some as large as 8,000–9,000) have been proposed in the 850-home community over the past six years. In response, a group of longtime residents formed Saving Arcadia, which is currently battling the municipal government and City Council. Its argument: Overly lenient rules for developers have led to the proliferation of McMansions on lots that were zoned back in the 1950s for smaller homes. Plus, these oversize dwellings overburden the city’s water, gas, electricity, and other utility services.

Yet not everyone is against mansionization. According to Benjamin Reznik, a Los Angeles–based lawyer who often represents large-scale developers, neighborhoods evolve—and need to be allowed to do so. So while he agrees that neighborhoods’ historic character needs to be preserved, he thinks NIMBYism (for “not in my back yard”)—where locals oppose almost all new, larger residences simply because they don’t want them nearby—is a mistake.

“City councils need to take a refined, surgical approach to proposed projects rather than just enacting zoning restrictions that don’t actually make sense for some of the plots of land being discussed,” Reznik contends. In fact he believes the most effective way forward when disputes arise is compromise that includes allowances such as reasonable increases in a residential structure’s height if it’s set back from the property line.

Another option is finding a creative solution. One example is building downward (if a property is set on a hill) in order to increase square footage while preserving neighboring views, which is increasingly happening in various areas near Newport Beach. So maybe there’s hope that we can all play nice after all?

‘The neighborhood I loved is gone’

For Per Lee, however, things have already gone too far. She’s recently decided to sell her home, even though she knows it will most likely be replaced by the very kind of McMansion she hates. The silver lining: She frequently receives unsolicited offers from builders who want to buy her property, and the prices keep going up.

Per Lee says she’ll miss the neighborhood where she’s lived for decades, and her fruit trees, but that she’s looking forward to relocating to a quieter area that’s more in line with her values. After all, she points out, “Bigger isn’t always better.”

Source: Realtor.com, Audrey Brashich
http://www.realtor.com/news/trends/mcmansion-next-door/


RELATED: McMansion Definition 

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

New study shows profound impact of tech industry on Bay Area real estate

To say that the tech sector has an effect on the real estate market here in the Silicon Valley would be a huge understatement, but still a good article though.


The tech industry. Over and over in recent years, this economic sector has been targeted as the cause of dramatic upticks in both home prices and rents in the Bay Area.

But is this a fair accusation? Apparently so, according to a new Zillow study. “[This analysis] highlights the widening wealth gap between tech company employees and other U.S. workers – a gap that is putting increasing pressure on housing markets where tech companies are booming,” said Zillow chief economist Dr. Svenja Gudell.

Facebook, Apple, Google and home ownership

First off, home values: Data show that Google, Facebook and Apple employees live in pricier homes than other Bay Area workers and have faster home value growth as well. In fact, the average Apple worker now lives in a home that is more than five times more valuable than the average U.S. home, according to Zillow.

Using census data, Zillow found the “typical worker at Apple’s Cupertino, Calif., headquarters lives in a home that is worth about $1.14 million, about $241,000 (27 percent) more than the median home in the already-pricey San Jose metro area and $380,000 (50 percent) above the median home value in the San Francisco metro area.”

Apple’s not alone. Workers at Google and Facebook headquarters — in Mountain View and Menlo Park respectively – live in more valuable homes as well. The median home value among Facebook workers is $1.25 million; among Google workers, it’s $1.28 million.

Zillow used data from the U.S. Census Bureau tracking where workers live and work across the Bay Area, then combined that data with Zillow’s Living Database of All Homes to compute a median home value for workers at the Apple, Google, and Facebook campuses in the Silicon Valley. Boiled down, the information shows:


  • On average, employees of Google, Facebook and Apple live in homes with a median value of well over $1 million.
  • Homes rented or owned by employees of these three tech companies are worth more than surrounding homes and are appreciating more quickly than surrounding homes

The gap, just like the iPhone, is getting bigger: 

The gap between tech employee home values and those of surrounding areas has grown larger. Apple workers’ home values took off after the first iPhone was released in June 2007. Apple’s stock price rose, increasing the wealth of many employees and cementing the company as one of the most successful in the world. Prior to summer 2007, the typical Apple worker lived in a home that was 13 percent more expensive than the typical San Jose home; since summer 2007, that gap has widened  to 20 percent.

As recently as 2010, homes in the neighborhoods where Apple workers lived were worth only three times the national median. Now they are worth five times that median.

Apple’s gains are the most dramatic, likely thanks to the iPhone. In the same period, the typical Google employee went from living in a home that was 37 percent more expensive than the average San Jose home in 2007 to living in one that is now 39 percent more expensive. For Facebook employees, the gap went from 31 percent to 33 percent.

San Francisco metro highlights

Other interesting (and possibly troubling) local findings point to recently inflated housing prices in all areas in the San Francisco metro, including rent:


  • Condos have appreciated 13.5 percent over the past year
  • Single-family homes have appreciated 12 percent over the past year
  • Rent has gone up 13.3 percent over the past year

The takeway

Probably the only thing we didn’t already know here is just how much and how deeply the tech boom has impacted local real estate. If you’re qualified to work for these companies, you’re likely qualified to buy and/or rent homes nearby. Other people, however, may be thoroughly priced out.

Anna theOnThe Block blog, Marie Erwert
http://blog.sfgate.com/ontheblock/2015/11/02/new-study-shows-profound-impact-of-tech-industry-on-bay-area-real-estate/

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Great new Mixed Use property coming to Cupertino

The City of Cupertino is looking to apparently approve a mixed use property to replace what is now known as the Vallco Shopping Center (a few blocks from my office). In the area of Wolf Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard, this mixed use property, to be built by Sand Hill Property Co, will feature a 30 acre elevated park that will be built over the buildings, 800 residential units, 2 million square feet of offices and 625,000 square feet of retail space. And looking at the computer renderings, this place will be absolutely awesome if approved. Read more about it from the great article below from the Silicon Valley Business Journal and then look at the computer renderings of what the project is proposed to look like.


Vallco plans revealed: 30-acre sky-park over Cupertino mixed-use center would be world's largest

When Sand Hill Property Co. acquired Cupertino’s failed Vallco Shopping Mall last year, executives weighed two options: Propose a perfectly competent — but rather ordinary — mixed-use town center for the 50-acre site. Or go big.
They chose the latter.

On Wednesday, officials revealed a sweeping $3 billion design from international “starchitect” Rafael Viñoly, working with Olin Landscape Architects, that has, as its defining element, the world’s largest green roof — a 30-acre elevated park that seems to dance off the tops of buildings, connecting them to each other and the ground.

“After we bought Vallco, we said, let’s not to do a run-of-the-mill project,” said Sand Hill principal and founder Peter Pau in an interview earlier this week. “Why would we bother? We’re looking at a unique situation, and we have to do something unique.”

With an orchard, a vineyard, and 3.8 miles of trails meandering above Cupertino, the project — announced at a meeting Wednesday at the Rotary Club of Cupertino — is like nothing ever attempted. Its ambition continues below the landscape layer: A 15-block, mixed-use street grid filled with 625,000 square feet of retail, 2 million square feet of office and 800 residential units.

Called “the Hills at Vallco,” it’s the biggest bet yet for Pau’s Sand Hill, a prodigious development firm that is being backed in the deal by the U.S. subsidiary of Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund. And it is not without risk.

The project is large for Cupertino — a town where much smaller proposals are often met with resistance, and sometimes referendums. The retail roughly equals San Jose’s Santana Row mixed-use juggernaut, while the office is twice the heft of the Adobe Systems headquarters in downtown San Jose.

Then there’s the elevated park, which would be a tremendous engineering feat. It’s at least twice as big as anything attempted before it, Sand Hill officials said. And while they say their team knows how to build it, they acknowledge the cost is huge.
“The roof is not cheap,” said Sand Hill Managing Director Reed Moulds in an interview. “There aren’t many developers out there that would be willing to do this project as proposed. We’re spending a lot of money because we want to be a long-term owner here.”

To secure the community buy-in, the developer is going all-out, promising to contribute more than $40 million to build a new K-5 elementary school, replace portable classrooms and provide an “innovation center” to the Fremont Union High School District, among other goodies. Consider it part of doing business in Cupertino, where concern over development’s impacts on the city’s world-famous schools can sink even a garden-variety apartment building.

“What we affirmed throughout the community engagement process was protecting the schools. And not only protecting them, but making them better with this project,” Moulds said.

The redevelopment is something of a personal mission for Pau. As a young college student in the 1980s, he used to window-shop at the then-thriving mall with his girlfriend (now wife and business partner) Susanna — though he says he couldn’t afford to buy much at the time. As he became established as a prodigious real estate developer, he always felt called to Vallco, which had sunk into a deep funk under a revolving ownership and series of foreclosures.

Finally, in November, Sand Hill succeeded in acquiring all of the mall’s separately owned parcels at a cost of more than $300 million — putting the asset under single ownership for the first time since it opened. Given the fact that the mall was not profitable, and that redevelopment approvals are not guaranteed, it was an audacious move.

"Cupertino's been good to me all these years," Pau said in a November interview. "I consider this to be good for the city and I feel like I'm the right person to get this thing done."

Coming up with the look
Over the next eight months, Sand Hill spearheaded an intense “community engagement” effort, hosting dozens of meetings and soliciting comments from residents through a Web portal. One of the thousands of comments executives heard: That the east side of Cupertino, where Vallco is located, sees all the city’s development, but has very little open space.

At the same time, Sand Hill had initiated an international design competition that attracted some of the world’s top architecture firms — drawn to the site’s high-profile Silicon Valley location across the freeway from Apple’s Norman Foster-designed Apple Campus 2, now under construction.

Sand Hill shared the open-space message with the firms, but executives didn’t quite know what they would get when Viñoly traveled to their offices in Menlo Park last April for a first-round presentation. While other architects came armed with reams of site plans and renderings, Viñoly had a suitcase. In it was a model of his concept, which he assembled piece by piece, topping it off with the roof park.

“It was everything we asked for coming together in one unified form and concept,” Moulds said. His next thought: “We need to figure out if we can deliver this. But I think this is the project of the community’s dreams.”

After more research and a meeting at Viñoly’s New York offices, the decision was made in May to go with the architect, whose other project in the area is the New Stanford Hospital in Palo Alto. They paired Viñoly with Olin Landscape Architects, which is also working on Apple Campus 2.

“These two groups had a fabulous vision for the project,” Moulds said. “The way they responded to the city’s direction and community feedback we shared with them was gripping for us. And they understand what needs to happen to make projects come alive in Silicon Valley.”

But can they build it?
The Vallco redevelopment is just the latest in a string of high-profile project designs to hit Silicon Valley in the past several years; in addition to Apple Inc.’s “spaceship,” Google this year unveiled plans for a glass-domed campus in Mountain View, with floors that can shift according to changing workplace needs. Nvidia is starting construction this month on a massive campus based on the polygon — the basic element of computer graphics. And Samsung is about to open a new 10-story building in north San Jose that challenges a simple understanding of inside, outside and basic form.

The Viñoly proposal, though, could signal a new phase in real estate one-upsmanship, as ambitious, “statement” architecture spreads beyond the domain of tech giants to speculative real estate developers.

“It can’t be within familiar parameters anymore. It has to be really distinctive,” said Louise Mozingo, professor and chair of U.C. Berkeley’s Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, summing up the current design environment.

Yet the Viñoly design, she said, appears to be about more than flash, signaling designers and developers are grappling with how to balance density with more bucolic tendencies, as Silicon Valley feels more and more squeezed.

“We’ve thought about layering residential, commercial, office, retail and open space on a horizontal plane,” she said. “What this is trying to do is actually layer them vertically. The advantage is you can think about creating a mixed-use, dense environment that has a great degree of livability.”

The concept also shows a kind of discomfort with density, she noted, in that it seems to ask, “How can we make density not look like density?”

Indeed, in an interview, the developer highlighted the way in which the rolling landscaped roof gradates up from the east side, making it appear as a gentle hillock to the adjacent single-family home neighborhood. At its highest point, near Interstate 280, the buildings reach seven stories high. But in renderings from the roof perspective, the view is pastoral. Oak trees, a vineyard, trails and a playground seem to merge with the Santa Cruz Mountains in the distance.

Two questions: Engineering and the retail marketplace
To be sure, the roof component is incredibly ambitious. “We know Santana Row works, but this is bigger and more complex in terms of land use and diversity of uses,” Mozingo said. “Then there’s this piece that’s swooping over it. It’s hard to know how people will react.”

The technical issues are also substantial, she noted, and the costs are likely to be enormous. While most large green roofs — such as Facebook's building-top park in Menlo Park — are flat, the Vallco plan calls for a park that curves in gentle waves, adding even more complexity to the equation. “If you do a tar and gravel roof, this is really really different,” she said.

But that, executives said, is the whole point: “It’s not easy, but it’s possible (to build it),” Pau said. “We have a whole bunch of people looking at it, and we know it can work.”

Perhaps a larger question involves the viability of retail in the Vallco area at all. For decades, the mall withered from its position between the twin poles of Stanford Shopping Center in Palo Alto and Westfield Valley Fair in San Jose. Observers agree that office and apartments will lease all day long in Cupertino. But it’s natural to wonder about the retail given past history.

Sand Hill, which has done numerous mixed-use projects around the region including several in Cupertino, knows what it’s in for. “Task 1 is making retail work here again,” Moulds said.

The new plan involves a retail loop on the eastern side of the project, with larger retailers facing Stevens Creek. Shops would line the ground floor of several blocks; a market hall, plus three acres of plazas, are also in the mix. The massive amount of office space creates build-in customer base during the day; the apartments would add life on weekends and at night. The concept adheres to the general theme of an “entertainment-focused downtown” that is all the rage these days in mixed-use development. (Sand Hill announced that the extremely popular AMC theater would get a new home in the project, with the cinemas remaining in their current home in the meantime.)

There is some early sign of momentum in this area: Main Street Cupertino, a 17-acre mixed-use concept Sand Hill is developing a short hop away from Vallco, is leasing up well, with new-to-the-area stores and restaurants; the project’s 21,000-square-foot anchor space is leased, though officials have not announced the tenant.

“With this plan and the mix of uses we think we have a successful approach,” Moulds said. “But it’s no longer the mall format. It’s been proven not to work. We need to create a downtown environment.”
But won’t the added engineering and construction costs require higher rents, making the project uncompetitive? “My philosophy,” Pau said, “is if you have the best product in town, we’ll get the best rent in town. We do think, as an owner for 40 or 50 or 60 years, you’ll come out OK.”

Vallco's redevelopment received a boost when the city allocated additional development capacity to the mall area — 2 million square feet of office, 600,000 square feet of retail and 389 housing units. The next step is for Sand Hill to turn in its development application, which the company says it plans to do in the weeks ahead. The plan's larger number of proposed housing units will have to be reconciled with the city's smaller allocation. But it's safe to say that planners probably didn't anticipate anything like the new concept and community benefits package.

“No one’s making us do it like this,” Pau said. “It’s not driven by economics. No tenant is asking us to do this. It’s just something where, people will look at it and say, 'This is great.' It’s something that’s more of a public amenity.”

Source: Silicon Valley Business Journal, Nathan Donato-Weinstein
http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2015/08/26/vallco-plans-revealed-30-acre-sky-park-over.html?surround=etf&ana=e_article












Friday, March 27, 2015

With Sunny, Modern Homes, Joseph Eichler Built The Suburbs In Style

Here in the Silicon Valley we have a few areas that have swaths of Eichler style homes like in the Ranch Rinconada area of Cupertino, Sunnyvale and Palo Alto. I've sold a few of them myself. Some people love them, other hate them. Anyhow, below is a great article from npr.org about Eichler homes.

After World War II, developer Joseph Eichler built well-designed and well-crafted tract homes that dotted California suburbs.

With Sunny, Modern Homes, Joseph Eichler Built The Suburbs In Style

In Palm Springs, Calif., a $1 million home was just built — with plans resurrected from 1951. The original sold for about $15,000, and was called an Eichler, after developer Joseph Eichler, who offered well-designed, well-built tract homes to the masses a half-century ago.

Bernie Grossman and his wife, Lyla, bought their Eichler home in 1963. Bernie was starting a law practice, and a client told him about these new modern houses going up in Granada Hills, about 45 minutes from downtown Los Angeles. "He said way up here in this wasteland there's some crazy builders building a house ... I looked at them and, I dunno, they're kind of weird," Grossman recalls.

Single-story homes, with open spaces, floor-to-ceiling glass walls and clean, serene lines. Bernie fell in love. He paid $30,000, and raised three children in the house. In fact, Parents Magazine once said an Eichler was the best house in the U.S. for raising children.

"You had two wings completely — with toilet and everything so that each side is independent," Grossman explains. "You can separate the adults from the children without [their] killing each other."

The house has five small bedrooms, arranged in two separate wings around the living area and open air atrium (there's a tree growing up through the roof). Each wing has bathrooms (which has helped keep the peace between the Grossmans). It's a house designed for California living and sunshine.

There are 108 Eichler homes in this tract; it's called Balboa Highlands. And Lyla Grossman says Eichler not only built handsome, affordable modern homes for the masses; he wanted everyone, and anyone, to have them. "My greatest respect for all these homes is that he wanted integration," she says. "And that was very new in this area — completely new ... And that's why I loved it so much."

The Grossmans' neighbor, Adriene Biondo knew a couple — they've since died — who were the only African-American owners at first. She remembers that they told her: "We felt confident in moving here because we heard that the Eichlers' nondiscrimination policy meant that if we didn't like our neighbors, he would buy our house back."

Biondo, the author of Modern Tract Homes of Los Angeles, worked for 10 years to get "Historic District" status for Balboa Highlands. She says Eichler's philosophy, and the houses that his architects — A. Quincy Jones and partner Frederick Emmons — designed were magnets for certain kinds of buyers.

"It's not just the modern architecture," Biondo says. "It attracts people who love to live in a modern way."

Flowing spaces, no boxy little rooms, all the glass (the Grossmans' house survived three earthquakes without one cracked window wall). Early buyers were artists, a Disney animator, many elementary school teachers — "we even had one Republican," Bernie Grossman says.

Movie and ad-makers shoot in these California-modern Eichler houses all the time. A few years ago, Taco Bell used the Grossman's 2,500-square-foot home in a Super Bowl commercial.

Architecture historian and writer Alan Hess says after World War II, Eichler built some 11,000 single-family homes in California. Most of them are in the San Francisco Bay area. But some went South.

"Southern California was booming after World War II," Hess says. "Many soldiers and sailors had come through here on their way to the Pacific, and many of them came back to stay."

They left Kansas and Idaho and Illinois for jobs in aerospace, oil and entertainment. They wanted to start families, and buy homes with backyards, homes made with materials developed during the war and now available to everyone — like plywood, plastics, formica for the countertops and, of course, stainless steel for all the new appliances. The houses were modern, optimistic about the future — they were what these soldiers been fighting for.

During the war, Eichler's family had rented a Frank Lloyd Wright house outside of San Francisco. He loved its simple modern lines and spaces. He began building houses like that — and kept tabs on them. Not long after the Grossmans moved into their Balboa Highlands house, Eichler came to look at it.

"He was just like someone from the East who was in business," Lyla Grossman remembers. "He was not a California boy. He was not easy. He was a bit gruff."

But he built houses in the sun, which make residents like Adriene Biondo feel free and artistic. "The architecture really does inform the way you live," she says. You can tell the time of day by the light outside. "Suddenly you look in the living room and it's engulfed in a pinkish-orange glow and you realize: I've been working all day and it's sunset."

Biondo has been in her Balboa Highlands Eichler home for 20 years and says it's the best place she's ever lived. "It's not like living in a normal house at all," she says. "There's nothing conventional about it."

The creation of suburbs after World War II marched rows of ticky-tacky tract houses across America. The houses Joseph Eichler built rejected ticky tack — and offered stunning modern spaces on graceful curving streets to generations of families.



Source: npr.org, Susan Stamberg
http://www.npr.org/2015/03/16/392561864/with-sunny-modern-homes-joseph-eichler-built-the-suburbs-in-style


Thursday, February 26, 2015

Used McMansions are selling briskly

According to new data, McMansion's are selling like hotcakes. McMansions are homes in the $750K to $1M price range (though that price range is higher here in the valley), are really big compared to lot they are built on, and doesn't really fit for the neighborhood it is built in. According to the article from Market Watch, existing home sales in January were basically flat, but the higher end homes, the McMansions have seen a 13% increase in sales.

Usually these are homes someone built in an existing neighborhood of older, smaller, average homes. It's like the one newer, nice house some built in the neighborhood. An example of that here in the Silicon Valley is the Ranco Rinconada area of Cupertino (the area west of Lawrence Expressway, East of Miller Ave, South of Stevens Creek Blvd, North of Bollinger Rd). In this area you will find, if I may call it so, lower cost homes built in the 1950s of Stern and Price design. Dotted among these lower end homes (which are pretty high value at an average sales price of $1.5M since it is Cupertino after all) are McMansions. The reason why home buyers and investors have been flocking to the area over the years and buying homes there is because they sit on HUGE lots. I'm talking 7,000 Sq. Ft on average, some lots as big 11,000 Sq. Ft. So with those ginormous lots, investors and some home buyers are tearing down the smaller, older existing home and building giant home new homes. They are typically two stories, with the newer amenities, allot more square feet inside and taking up more of the lot they are built on. The house definitely doesn't match compared to the neighborhood it sits in. Anyhow, whoever coined the term McMansions might have been thinking about Rancho Rinconada.

Saturday, February 21, 2015

Saturday stats

Happy Saturday everyone!

Market activity for the Cupertino area as of 02-20-15. Active, Pending and Sold for the last 30 days for single family residential homes.


Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Good luck finding Class A office space in Sunnyvale

Good luck finding Class A office space in Sunnyvale
Screen Shot 2015 02 16 at 10
I've known for some time that office space is at a premium here in Cupertino where my office is due to Apple leasing up much of the available office space in the city, but I didn't know this is the case in nearby Sunnyvale. After all, residential real estate is more my specialty, but anyhow, according to the article from the Silicon Valley Business Journal, Blue Coat Systems just took a Class A office building off the market thus making market even tighter for tenants looking for office space.

Sunnyvale's office-space market gets tighter after Blue Coat's major lease